(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 3. DRI is not involved in initiation of the glial cell fate or repression of the neural cell fate decision in lateral glioblasts. (A) dri expression in longitudinal glia of a stage 12 embryo (arrow). (B) Whole-mount stage 12 dri1/dri2 embryo, derived from a maternal dri1 homozygous germline clone, stained with anti-REPO antibody. Loss of maternal and zygotic DRI does not interfere with the early behaviour of the LG. (C) Wild-type stage 15 embryo stained with anti-REPO antibody. (D) Ectopic expression of dri in the mesectoderm using sim-GAL4 does not induce longitudinal glial cell fate specification, as detected by anti-REPO staining (compare with C). (E) Ectopic expression of dri in parasegments T2-A4 using Kr-GAL4 (between arrowheads) does not inhibit neural differentiation, as detected by anti-ELAV antibody. (F) 22C10 antigen is correctly localized in a single somatic muscle fibre in dri1/dri2 homozygotes (arrowheads).