(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 9. Two different Minute mutations affect Atonal expression, whereas Egfr alleles do not. Eye discs stained for Atonal are shown inA-C,E,F,H,I,K,L,N,O,Q,R. Clones are negatively marked by ß-gal (white in D,G,J,M,P, blue in F,I,L,O,R) and are outlined. (A-C) Egfr alleles in trans to wild type; note normal Atonal expression. (D-R) hs:Flp-induced clones induced in trans to Minute chromosomes. (D-O) ß-gal-positive territories are heterozygous for the Egfr allele and for the Minute mutation. Black (ß-gal negative) territories are homozygous for the Egfr allele and are wild type for the Minute mutation. (P-R) ß-gal-positive territories are heterozygous for the Minute mutation. Black (ß-gal negative) territories are genetically (but not phenotypically) wild type. No Minute homozygous cells survive. Mutations are indicated on the left. Note, the Atonal pattern is not wild type in either the Egfr homozygous (black in D-O) or the Egfr heterozygous territories (compare the ß-gal-positive regions to the heterozygous examples shown in A-C). Also, the Atonal pattern is not wild type in either the wild-type territories (white arrows in P-R) or the adjacent Minute heterozygous cells (black arrows in P-R). Note that Minute(2)53 and Minute(2)56i have different, but self-consistent dominant effects on Atonal expression. Atonal expression in the Egfrtsla Minute+ clones is indistinguishable from that in the two Egfr null alleles. Scale bar: 10 µm.