(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Fig. 1. Interactions between SEU and AP1/SEP3 in yeast and in vitro. (A) A yeast two-hybrid interaction assay showing positive interactions between the SEU-BD bait and the AP1-AD or SEP3-AD prey. A truncated SEU without its Q2 and C-terminal domains was used in constructing SEU-BD, which no longer self-activates in yeast (Sridhar et al., 2004). Full-length AP1, SEP3, AP3 and PI were fused to GAL4-AD. Activation of HIS3 and lacZ is indicated by growth on -HIS media and by the blue color, respectively. Red colonies indicate a lack of ADE2 reporter activation (James et al., 1996). The relative level of lacZ (ß-galactosidase) activity is shown to the right. (B) A similar yeast two-hybrid interaction assay showing positive interactions between SEU-BD and the C-terminal domain of AP1 and SEP3 (AP1-C and SEP3-C). (C) An in vitro pull-down assay showing 35S-labeled AP1 and SEP3 proteins retained by GST-SEU (right). Equal amounts of in vitro translated products were loaded onto the NuPAGE gel (INPUT lanes). GST alone failed to retain any of the 35S proteins (data not shown). (D) A three-protein pull-down assay with SEU-GST serving as a bridging protein. The ability of MBP-LUFS/amylose beads to retain 35S-labeled AP1, SEP3 or AP3 was tested in the presence (+) or absence (-) of SEUGST. MBP was used as a negative control.