|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 100, Issue 2 245-260, Copyright © 1987 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
TH Meedel, RJ Crowther and JR Whittaker
Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543.
Blastomeres removed from early cleavage stage ascidian embryos and reared to 'maturity' as partial embryos often elaborate tissue-specific features typical of their constituent cell lineages. We used this property to study recent corrections of the ascidian larval muscle lineage and to compare the ways in which different lineages give rise to muscle. Our evaluation of muscle differentiation was based on histochemical localization and quantitative radiometric measurement of a muscle-specific acetylcholinesterase activity, and the development of myofilaments and myofibrils as observed by electron microscopy. Although the posterior-vegetal blastomeres (B4.1 pair) of the 8-cell embryo have long been believed to be the sole precursors of larval muscle, recent studies using horseradish peroxidase to mark cell lineages have shown that small numbers of muscle cells originate from the anterior-vegetal (A4.1) and posterior-animal (b4.2) blastomeres of this stage. Fully differentiated muscle expression in isolated partial embryos of A4.1-derived cells requires an association with cells from other lineages whereas muscle from B4.1 blastomeres develops autonomously. Clear differences also occurred in the time acetylcholinesterase activity was first detected in partial embryos from these two sources. Isolated b4.2 cells failed to show any muscle development even in combination with anterior-animal cells (a4.2) and are presumably even more dependent on normal cell interactions and associations. Others have noted an additional distinction between the different sources of muscle: muscle cells from non-B4.1 lineages occur exclusively in the distal part of the tail, while the B4.1 descendants contribute those cells in the proximal and middle regions. During the course of ascidian larval evolution tail muscle probably had two origins: the primary lineage (B4.1) whose fate was set rigidly at early cleavage stages and secondarily evolved lineages which arose later by recruitment of cells from other tissues resulting in increased tail length. In contrast to the B4.1 lineage, muscle development in the secondary lineages is controlled less rigidly by processes that depend on cell interactions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Hudson and H. Yasuo A signalling relay involving Nodal and Delta ligands acts during secondary notochord induction in Ciona embryos Development, August 1, 2006; 133(15): 2855 - 2864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hudson and H. Yasuo Patterning across the ascidian neural plate by lateral Nodal signalling sources Development, March 15, 2005; 132(6): 1199 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Roegiers, C Djediat, R Dumollard, C Rouviere, and C Sardet Phases of cytoplasmic and cortical reorganizations of the ascidian zygote between fertilization and first division Development, January 6, 1999; 126(14): 3101 - 3117. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. TAKAHASHI and Y. OKAMURA Ion Channels and Early Development of Neural Cells Physiol Rev, April 1, 1998; 78(2): 307 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Meedel, S. Farmer, and J. Lee The single MyoD family gene of Ciona intestinalis encodes two differentially expressed proteins: implications for the evolution of chordate muscle gene regulation Development, January 5, 1997; 124(9): 1711 - 1721. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
