spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohrmann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gutzeit, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bohrmann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gutzeit, H.

Development, Vol 101, Issue 2 279-288, Copyright © 1987 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Evidence against electrophoresis as the principal mode of protein transport in vitellogenic ovarian follicles of Drosophila

J Bohrmann and H Gutzeit
Biologisches Institut I (Zoologie), Universitat Freiburg, Federal Republic of Germany.

Charged cell constituents in polytrophic insect follicles are thought to be transported in the nurse cell-oocyte syncytium by way of electrophoresis. This concept, proposed by Woodruff & Telfer (1980) was based on electrophysiological data and microinjection of heterologous proteins using Hyalophora follicles. By microinjecting fluorescently labelled acidic and basic proteins into the nurse cells or oocyte of vitellogenic Drosophila follicles, we failed to obtain evidence for charge-dependent migration of these molecules. We have also analyzed the proteins of nurse cells and oocyte on isoelectric focusing gels, by means of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and by ion exchange chromatography to see if basic or acidic proteins accumulate in vivo in nurse cells and oocyte, respectively. For the bulk of the follicular proteins we found no accumulation. Further evidence against an electrophoretic transport system in Drosophila was obtained by estimating the intracellular pH from the colour of indicator dyes microinjected into the follicles; the results indicate that the pH in the nurse cell cytoplasm is lower than that in the ooplasm. According to the model developed for Hyalophora, electrophoretic transport would be favoured by high pH in the nurse cell cytoplasm.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Darboux, E. Lingueglia, G. Champigny, S. Coscoy, P. Barbry, and M. Lazdunski
dGNaC1, a Gonad-specific Amiloride-sensitive Na+ Channel
J. Biol. Chem., April 17, 1998; 273(16): 9424 - 9429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
J Bohrmann and K Biber
Cytoskeleton-dependent transport of cytoplasmic particles in previtellogenic to mid-vitellogenic ovarian follicles of Drosophila: time-lapse analysis using video-enhanced contrast microscopy
J. Cell Sci., January 4, 1994; 107(4): 849 - 858.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1987