spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, D. L.

Development, Vol 104, Issue 2 321-329, Copyright © 1988 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Retinotopic refinement of the regenerating goldfish optic tract is not linked to activity-dependent refinement of the retinotectal map

JE Cook and DL Becker
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, UK.

The cut optic nerve of a goldfish can regenerate, restoring an orderly projection from the retina to the optic tectum. At first, regenerating axons make transient connections, many of them in inappropriate tectal locations. Later, their arrangement is gradually refined into an accurate retinotectal map by a process that depends on afferent activity. On their way to the tectum, many regenerating axons make erroneous choices between the two arms (brachia) of the optic tract. However, since they commonly possess divergent collateral branches, a secondary refinement of the brachial pattern can occur by selective collateral elimination. How or why a particular collateral is lost is not known, but we have previously suggested that sibling branches might compete to form stable tectal synapses, implying that there might be a causal link between refinement of the brachial pattern and refinement of the retinotectal map. In this paper, we have tested directly for such a link, blocking map refinement with tetrodotoxin (TTX) or stroboscopic light, verifying the effectiveness of the block and measuring the extent of brachial refinement by standard methods in experimental and control fish. Both TTX and stroboscopic light reliably prevented map refinement, their results being indistinguishable. However, neither had even the slightest detrimental effect on brachial refinement, either 42 days or 70 days after nerve cut. Evidently, neither activity nor a sharp retinotectal projection is necessary for brachial refinement. Theory and experiment both dictate that the basic projection pattern be controlled by a mechanism (such as chemoaffinity) that is independent of activity, and it would seem that selective collateral loss must depend on the same mechanism.




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1988