Development, Vol 124, Issue 15 2855-2865, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Genetic separation of the neural and cuticular patterning functions of gooseberry

M Duman-Scheel, X Li, I Orlov, M Noll and NH Patel
Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

In addition to their role in the specification of the epidermal pattern in each segment, several segment polarity genes, including gooseberry (gsb), specify cell fate in the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS). Analyses of the gsb CNS phenotype have been complicated by the fact that the previously available gsb mutants, all caused by cytologically visible deficiencies, have severe segmentation defects and also lack a number of additional genes. We have characterized two novel gsb mutants which, due to their hypomorphic nature, have CNS defects, but have only weak or no segmentation defects. These gsb alleles, as well as gsb rescue experiments, have allowed us to determine which aspects of the deficiency mutant phenotypes can be attributed to loss of gsb. gsb mutants lack U and CQ neurons, have duplicated RP2 neurons, and display posterior commissure defects. gsb neural defects, as well as the gsb cuticle defect, are differentially sensitive to the level of functional Gsb. We have used one of the novel gsb alleles in order to understand the genetic interactions between gsb, wingless (wg), and patched (ptc) during the patterning of the ventral neuroectoderm. In contrast to epidermal patterning, where Gsb is required to maintain wg transcription, we find that Gsb antagonizes the Wg signal that confers neuroblast (NB) 4-2 fate.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Gaziova and K. M. Bhat Ancestry-independent fate specification and plasticity in the developmental timing of a typical Drosophila neuronal lineage Development, January 15, 2009; 136(2): 263 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Urbach and G. M. Technau Segment polarity and DV patterning gene expression reveals segmental organization of the Drosophila brain Development, August 15, 2003; 130(16): 3607 - 3620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Bhat, E. van Beers, and P Bhat Sloppy paired acts as the downstream target of wingless in the Drosophila CNS and interaction between sloppy paired and gooseberry inhibits sloppy paired during neurogenesis Development, January 2, 2000; 127(3): 655 - 665. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Spradling, D. Stern, A. Beaton, E. J. Rhem, T. Laverty, N. Mozden, S. Misra, and G. M. Rubin The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project Gene Disruption Project: Single P-Element Insertions Mutating 25% of Vital Drosophila Genes Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 135 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Skeath The Drosophila EGF receptor controls the formation and specification of neuroblasts along the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila embryo Development, January 9, 1998; 125(17): 3301 - 3312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Dormand and A. Brand Runt determines cell fates in the Drosophila embryonic CNS Development, January 5, 1998; 125(9): 1659 - 1667. [Abstract] [PDF]