|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 125, Issue 22 4521-4530, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
MC Hanks, CA Loomis, E Harris, CX Tong, L Anson-Cartwright, A Auerbach and A Joyner
Developmental Genetics Program and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine and Departments of Cell Biology and Physiology and Neuroscience, NYU Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
The Engrailed-1 gene, En1, a murine homologue of the Drosophila homeobox gene engrailed (en), is required for midbrain and cerebellum development and dorsal/ventral patterning of the limbs. In Drosophila, en is involved in regulating a number of key patterning processes including segmentation of the epidermis. An important question is whether, during evolution, the biochemical properties of En proteins have been conserved, revealing a common underlying molecular mechanism to their diverse developmental activities. To address this question, we have replaced the coding sequences of En1 with Drosophila en. Mice expressing Drosophila en in place of En1 have a near complete rescue of the lethal En1 mutant brain defect and most skeletal abnormalities. In contrast, expression of Drosophila en in the embryonic limbs of En1 mutants does not lead to repression of Wnt7a in the embryonic ventral ectoderm or full rescue of the embryonic dorsal/ventral patterning defects. Furthermore, neither En2 nor en rescue the postnatal limb abnormalities that develop in rare En1 null mutants that survive. These studies demonstrate that the biochemical activity utilized in mouse to mediate brain development has been retained by Engrailed proteins across the phyla, and indicate that during evolution vertebrate En proteins have acquired two unique functions during embryonic and postnatal limb development and that only En1 can function postnatally.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. K. Sgaier, Z. Lao, M. P. Villanueva, F. Berenshteyn, D. Stephen, R. K. Turnbull, and A. L. Joyner Genetic subdivision of the tectum and cerebellum into functionally related regions based on differential sensitivity to engrailed proteins Development, June 15, 2007; 134(12): 2325 - 2335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. T. Hittinger, D. L. Stern, and S. B. Carroll Pleiotropic functions of a conserved insect-specific Hox peptide motif Development, December 1, 2005; 132(23): 5261 - 5270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Monticelli, D. C. Solymar, and A. Rao Role of NFAT Proteins in IL13 Gene Transcription in Mast Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36210 - 36218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Marie and J. M. Blagburn Differential Roles of Engrailed Paralogs in Determining Sensory Axon Guidance and Synaptic Target Recognition J. Neurosci., August 27, 2003; 23(21): 7854 - 7862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Bilovocky, R. R. Romito-DiGiacomo, C. L. Murcia, S. M. Maricich, and K. Herrup Factors in the Genetic Background Suppress the Engrailed-1 Cerebellar Phenotype J. Neurosci., June 15, 2003; 23(12): 5105 - 5112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Solano, B. Mugat, D. Martin, F. Girard, J.-M. Huibant, C. Ferraz, B. Jacq, J. Demaille, and F. Maschat Genome-wide identification of in vivo Drosophila Engrailed-binding DNA fragments and related target genes Development, April 1, 2003; 130(7): 1243 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Acampora, P. P. Boyl, M. Signore, J. P. Martinez-Barbera, C. Ilengo, E. Puelles, A. Annino, H. Reichert, G. Corte, and A. Simeone OTD/OTX2 functional equivalence depends on 5' and 3' UTR-mediated control of Otx2 mRNA for nucleo-cytoplasmic export and epiblast-restricted translation Development, December 1, 2001; 128(23): 4801 - 4813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. H. Simon, H. Saueressig, W. Wurst, M. D. Goulding, and D. D. M. O'Leary Fate of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons Controlled by the Engrailed Genes J. Neurosci., May 1, 2001; 21(9): 3126 - 3134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Liu and A. Joyner EN and GBX2 play essential roles downstream of FGF8 in patterning the mouse mid/hindbrain region Development, January 1, 2001; 128(2): 181 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. BABINET Transgenic Mice: An Irreplaceable Tool for the Study of Mammalian Development and Biology J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2000; 11(90002): 88S - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. Kimmel, D. H. Turnbull, V. Blanquet, W. Wurst, C. A. Loomis, and A. L. Joyner Two lineage boundaries coordinate vertebrate apical ectodermal ridge formation Genes & Dev., June 1, 2000; 14(11): 1377 - 1389. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Liu, K Losos, and A. Joyner FGF8 can activate Gbx2 and transform regions of the rostral mouse brain into a hindbrain fate Development, January 11, 1999; 126(21): 4827 - 4838. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I Araki and H Nakamura Engrailed defines the position of dorsal di-mesencephalic boundary by repressing diencephalic fate Development, January 11, 1999; 126(22): 5127 - 5135. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Ristoratore, M Carl, K Deschet, L Richard-Parpaillon, D Boujard, J Wittbrodt, D Chourrout, F Bourrat, and J. Joly The midbrain-hindbrain boundary genetic cascade is activated ectopically in the diencephalon in response to the widespread expression of one of its components, the medaka gene Ol-eng2 Development, January 9, 1999; 126(17): 3769 - 3779. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
