|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 126, Issue 15 3391-3405, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
S Mohanty, KA Jermyn, A Early, T Kawata, L Aubry, A Ceccarelli, P Schaap, JG Williams and RA Firtel
Department of Biology, Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0634, USA.
Dd-STATa is a structural and functional homologue of the metazoan STAT (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription) proteins. We show that Dd-STATa null cells exhibit several distinct developmental phenotypes. The aggregation of Dd-STATa null cells is delayed and they chemotax slowly to a cyclic AMP source, suggesting a role for Dd-STATa in these early processes. In Dd-STATa null strains, slug-like structures are formed but they have an aberrant pattern of gene expression. In such slugs, ecmB/lacZ, a marker that is normally specific for cells on the stalk cell differentiation pathway, is expressed throughout the prestalk region. Stalk cell differentiation in Dictyostelium has been proposed to be under negative control, mediated by repressor elements present in the promoters of stalk cell-specific genes. Dd-STATa binds these repressor elements in vitro and the ectopic expression of ecmB/lacZ in the null strain provides in vivo evidence that Dd-STATa is the repressor protein that regulates commitment to stalk cell differentiation. Dd-STATa null cells display aberrant behavior in a monolayer assay wherein stalk cell differentiation is induced using the stalk cell morphogen DIF. The ecmB gene, a general marker for stalk cell differentiation, is greatly overinduced by DIF in Dd-STATa null cells. Also, Dd-STATa null cells are hypersensitive to DIF for expression of ST/lacZ, a marker for the earliest stages in the differentiation of one of the stalk cell sub-types. We suggest that both these manifestations of DIF hypersensitivity in the null strain result from the balance between activation and repression of the promoter elements being tipped in favor of activation when the repressor is absent. Paradoxically, although Dd-STATa null cells are hypersensitive to the inducing effects of DIF and readily form stalk cells in monolayer assay, the Dd-STATa null cells show little or no terminal stalk cell differentiation within the slug. Dd-STATa null slugs remain developmentally arrested for several days before forming very small spore masses supported by a column of apparently undifferentiated cells. Thus, complete stalk cell differentiation appears to require at least two events: a commitment step, whereby the repression exerted by Dd-STATa is lifted, and a second step that is blocked in a Dd-STATa null organism. This latter step may involve extracellular cAMP, a known repressor of stalk cell differentiation, because Dd-STATa null cells are abnormally sensitive to the inhibitory effects of extracellular cyclic AMP.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Shimada and T. Kawata Evidence that Noncoding RNA dutA Is a Multicopy Suppressor of Dictyostelium discoideum STAT Protein Dd-STATa Eukaryot. Cell, June 1, 2007; 6(6): 1030 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Strmecki, G. Bloomfield, T. Araki, E. Dalton, J. Skelton, C. Schilde, A. Harwood, J. G. Williams, A. Ivens, and C. Pears Proteomic and Microarray Analyses of the Dictyostelium Zak1-GSK-3 Signaling Pathway Reveal a Role in Early Development Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2007; 6(2): 245 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Ekas, G.-H. Baeg, M. S. Flaherty, A. Ayala-Camargo, and E. A. Bach JAK/STAT signaling promotes regional specification by negatively regulating wingless expression in Drosophila Development, December 1, 2006; 133(23): 4721 - 4729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schmerer, I. Torregroza, A. Pascal, M. Umbhauer, and T. Evans STAT5 acts as a repressor to regulate early embryonic erythropoiesis Blood, November 1, 2006; 108(9): 2989 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fukuzawa, N. V. Zhukovskaya, Y. Yamada, T. Araki, and J. G. Williams Regulation of Dictyostelium prestalk-specific gene expression by a SHAQKY family MYB transcription factor Development, May 1, 2006; 133(9): 1715 - 1724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Andl, T. Mizushima, K. Oyama, M. Bowser, H. Nakagawa, and A. K. Rustgi EGFR-induced cell migration is mediated predominantly by the JAK-STAT pathway in primary esophageal keratinocytes Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): G1227 - G1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schilde, T. Araki, H. Williams, A. Harwood, and J. G. Williams GSK3 is a multifunctional regulator of Dictyostelium development Development, September 15, 2004; 131(18): 4555 - 4565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. V. Zhukovskaya,, M. Fukuzawa,, M. Tsujioka, K. A. Jermyn, T. Kawata, T. Abe, M. Zvelebil, and J. G. Williams Dd-STATb, a Dictyostelium STAT protein with a highly aberrant SH2 domain, functions as a regulator of gene expression during growth and early development Development, January 15, 2004; 131(2): 447 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Wang and A. Kuspa CulB, a Putative Ubiquitin Ligase Subunit, Regulates Prestalk Cell Differentiation and Morphogenesis in Dictyostelium spp. Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2002; 1(1): 126 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Dormann, T Abe, C. Weijer, and J Williams Inducible nuclear translocation of a STAT protein in Dictyostelium prespore cells: implications for morphogenesis and cell-type regulation Development, January 4, 2001; 128(7): 1081 - 1088. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Jaffer, M Khosla, G. Spiegelman, and G Weeks Expression of activated Ras during Dictyostelium development alters cell localization and changes cell fate Development, January 3, 2001; 128(6): 907 - 916. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Fukuzawa and J. Williams Analysis of the promoter of the cudA gene reveals novel mechanisms of Dictyostelium cell type differentiation Development, January 6, 2000; 127(12): 2705 - 2713. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||