|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 126, Issue 9 1823-1832, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
Y Kato, WM Rideout, K Hilton, SC Barton, Y Tsunoda and MA Surani
Wellcome CRC Institute of Cancer and Developmental Biology and Physiological Laboratory, Tennis Court Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
There are distinctive and characteristic genomic modifications in primordial germ cells that distinguish the germ cell lineage from somatic cells. These modifications include, genome-wide demethylation, erasure of allele-specific methylation associated with imprinted genes, and the re-activation of the X chromosome. The allele-specific differential methylation is involved in regulating the monoallelic expression, and thus the gene dosage, of imprinted genes, which underlies functional differences between parental genomes. However, when the imprints are erased in the germ line, the parental genomes acquire an equivalent epigenetic and functional state. Therefore, one of the reasons why primordial germ cells are unique is because this is the only time in mammals when the distinction between parental genomes ceases to exist. To test how the potentially imprint-free primordial germ cell nuclei affect embryonic development, we transplanted them into enucleated oocytes. Here we show that the reconstituted oocyte developed to day 9.5 of gestation, consistently as a small embryo and a characteristic abnormal placenta. The embryo proper also did not progress much further even when the inner cell mass was 'rescued' from the abnormal placenta by transfer into a tetraploid host blastocyst. We found that development of the experimental conceptus was affected, at least in part, by a lack of gametic imprints, as judged by DNA methylation and expression analysis of several imprinted genes. The evidence suggests that gametic imprints are essential for normal development, and that they can neither be initiated nor erased in mature oocytes; these properties are unique to the developing germ line.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. L. Fortier, F. L. Lopes, N. Darricarrere, J. Martel, and J. M. Trasler Superovulation alters the expression of imprinted genes in the midgestation mouse placenta Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2008; 17(11): 1653 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Labialle, L. Yang, X. Ruan, A. Villemain, J. V. Schmidt, A. Hernandez, T. Wiltshire, N. Cermakian, and A. K. Naumova Coordinated diurnal regulation of genes from the Dlk1 Dio3 imprinted domain: implications for regulation of clusters of non-paralogous genes Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 15 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A.L Green, D.N Wells, and B Oback Cattle Cloned from Increasingly Differentiated Muscle Cells Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 395 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. K Berg, C. Li, G. Asher, D. N Wells, and B. Oback Red Deer Cloned from Antler Stem Cells and Their Differentiated Progeny Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 384 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I.B. Van den Veyver and T.K. Al-Hussaini Biparental hydatidiform moles: a maternal effect mutation affecting imprinting in the offspring Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2006; 12(3): 233 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Yamazaki, E. W. Low, Y. Marikawa, K. Iwahashi, M. S. Bartolomei, J. R. McCarrey, and R. Yanagimachi Adult mice cloned from migrating primordial germ cells PNAS, August 9, 2005; 102(32): 11361 - 11366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Moore and M. Ball Kaguya, the first parthenogenetic mammal - engineering triumph or lottery winner? Reproduction, July 1, 2004; 128(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lucifero, M. R.W. Mann, M. S. Bartolomei, and J. M. Trasler Gene-specific timing and epigenetic memory in oocyte imprinting Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2004; 13(8): 839 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Kato, H. Imabayashi, T. Mori, T. Tani, M. Taniguchi, M. Higashi, M. Matsumoto, A. Umezawa, and Y. Tsunoda Nuclear Transfer of Adult Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Developmental Totipotency of Tissue-Specific Stem Cells from an Adult Mammal Biol Reprod, February 1, 2004; 70(2): 415 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lucifero, J.R. Chaillet, and J. M. Trasler Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 3 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Yamazaki, M. R. W. Mann, S. S. Lee, J. Marh, J. R. McCarrey, R. Yanagimachi, and M. S. Bartolomei Reprogramming of primordial germ cells begins before migration into the genital ridge, making these cells inadequate donors for reproductive cloning PNAS, October 14, 2003; 100(21): 12207 - 12212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Kaneko-Ishino, T. Kohda, and F. Ishino The Regulation and Biological Significance of Genomic Imprinting in Mammals J. Biochem., June 1, 2003; 133(6): 699 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Lee, K. Inoue, R. Ono, N. Ogonuki, T. Kohda, T. Kaneko-Ishino, A. Ogura, and F. Ishino Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells Development, March 6, 2003; 129(8): 1807 - 1817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. G. Cezar, M. S. Bartolomei, E. J. Forsberg, N. L. First, M. D. Bishop, and K. J. Eilertsen Genome-Wide Epigenetic Alterations in Cloned Bovine Fetuses Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 1009 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Obata and T. Kono Maternal Primary Imprinting Is Established at a Specific Time for Each Gene throughout Oocyte Growth J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2002; 277(7): 5285 - 5289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Zwart, F. Sleutels, A. Wutz, A. H. Schinkel, and D. P. Barlow Bidirectional action of the Igf2r imprint control element on upstream and downstream imprinted genes Genes & Dev., September 15, 2001; 15(18): 2361 - 2366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. C. Ferguson-Smith and M. A. Surani Imprinting and the Epigenetic Asymmetry Between Parental Genomes Science, August 10, 2001; 293(5532): 1086 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. M. Rideout III, K. Eggan, and R. Jaenisch Nuclear Cloning and Epigenetic Reprogramming of the Genome Science, August 10, 2001; 293(5532): 1093 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. De Sousa, T. King, L. Harkness, L. E. Young, S. K. Walker, and I. Wilmut Evaluation of Gestational Deficiencies in Cloned Sheep Fetuses and Placentae Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 23 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-i. Horike, K. Mitsuya, M. Meguro, N. Kotobuki, A. Kashiwagi, T. Notsu, T. C. Schulz, Y. Shirayoshi, and M. Oshimura Targeted disruption of the human LIT1 locus defines a putative imprinting control element playing an essential role in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2000; 9(14): 2075 - 2083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
