|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 127, Issue 8 1573-1582, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
F Janody, J Reischl and N Dostatni
LGPD, IBDM, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Case 907, Marseille, France.
Anterior terminal development is controlled by several zygotic genes that are positively regulated at the anterior pole of Drosophila blastoderm embryos by the anterior (bicoid) and the terminal (torso) maternal determinants. Most Bicoid target genes, however, are first expressed at syncitial blastoderm as anterior caps, which retract from the anterior pole upon activation of Torso. To better understand the interaction between Bicoid and Torso, a derivative of the Gal4/UAS system was used to selectively express the best characterised Bicoid target gene, hunchback, at the anterior pole when its expression should be repressed by Torso. Persistence of hunchback at the pole mimics most of the torso phenotype and leads to repression at early stages of a labral (cap'n'collar) and two foregut (wingless and hedgehog) determinants that are positively controlled by bicoid and torso. These results uncovered an antagonism between hunchback and bicoid at the anterior pole, whereas the two genes are known to act in concert for most anterior segmented development. They suggest that the repression of hunchback by torso is required to prevent this antagonism and to promote anterior terminal development, depending mostly on bicoid activity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  X. Sun, T. Morozova, and M. Sonnenfeld Glial and Neuronal Functions of the Drosophila Homolog of the Human SWI/SNF Gene ATR-X (DATR-X) and the jing Zinc-Finger Gene Specify the Lateral Positioning of Longitudinal Glia and Axons Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1397 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Yu, K.-H. Kang, P. Heine, U. Pyati, S. Srinivasan, B. Biehs, D. Kimelman, and E. Bier Cysteine Repeat Domains and Adjacent Sequences Determine Distinct Bone Morphogenetic Protein Modulatory Activities of the Drosophila Sog Protein Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1323 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Leismann and C. F. Lehner Drosophila securin destruction involves a D-box and a KEN-box and promotes anaphase in parallel with Cyclin A degradation J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2003; 116(12): 2453 - 2460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kumar, K. Jayaraman, S. Panchanathan, R. Gurunathan, A. Marti-Subirana, and S. J. Newfeld BEST: A Novel Computational Approach for Comparing Gene Expression Patterns From Early Stages of Drosophila melanogaster Development Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 2037 - 2047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Gamberi, D. S. Peterson, L. He, and E. Gottlieb An anterior function for the Drosophila posterior determinant Pumilio Development, January 6, 2002; 129(11): 2699 - 2710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Janody, R. Sturny, V. Schaeffer, Y. Azou, and N. Dostatni Two distinct domains of Bicoid mediate its transcriptional downregulation by the Torso pathway Development, June 15, 2001; 128(12): 2281 - 2290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. A. Wimmer, A. Carleton, P. Harjes, T. Turner, and C. Desplan bicoid-Independent Formation of Thoracic Segments in Drosophila Science, March 31, 2000; 287(5462): 2476 - 2479. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
