spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manzanares, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krumlauf, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manzanares, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krumlauf, R.
Development 128, 3595-3607 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Independent regulation of initiation and maintenance phases of Hoxa3 expression in the vertebrate hindbrain involve auto- and cross-regulatory mechanisms

Miguel Manzanares1,*, Sophie Bel-Vialar1, Linda Ariza-McNaughton1,{ddagger}, Elisabetta Ferretti2, Heather Marshall1,4, Mark M. Maconochie3, Francesco Blasi2 and Robb Krumlauf1,4,§

1 Division of Developmental Neurobiology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
2 Molecular Genetics Unit, DIBIT, Università Vita-Salute S. Raffaele, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy
3 Mammalian Genetics Unit, MRC, Harwell, Oxon OX11 0RD, UK
4 Stowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th Street, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
* Present address: Department of Developmental Neurobiology, Instituto Cajal, CSIC, Av. Doctor Arce 37, 28002 Madrid, Spain
{ddagger} Present address: The Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgshire CB10 1SA, UK

§Author for correspondence (e-mail: rek{at}stowers-institute.org)

Accepted June 22, 2001

During development of the vertebrate hindbrain, Hox genes play multiples roles in the segmental processes that regulate anteroposterior (AP) patterning. Paralogous Hox genes, such as Hoxa3, Hoxb3 and Hoxd3, generally have very similar patterns of expression, and gene targeting experiments have shown that members of paralogy group 3 can functionally compensate for each other. Hence, distinct functions for individual members of this family may primarily depend upon differences in their expression domains. The earliest domains of expression of the Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes in hindbrain rhombomeric (r) segments are transiently regulated by kreisler, a conserved Maf b-Zip protein, but the mechanisms that maintain expression in later stages are unknown. In this study, we have compared the segmental expression and regulation of Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 in mouse and chick embryos to investigate how they are controlled after initial activation. We found that the patterns of Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 expression in r5 and r6 in later stages during mouse and chick hindbrain development were differentially regulated. Hoxa3 expression was maintained in r5 and r6, while Hoxb3 was downregulated. Regulatory comparisons of cis-elements from the chick and mouse Hoxa3 locus in both transgenic mouse and chick embryos have identified a conserved enhancer that mediates the late phase of Hoxa3 expression through a conserved auto/cross-regulatory loop. This block of similarity is also present in the human and horn shark loci, and contains two bipartite Hox/Pbx-binding sites that are necessary for its in vivo activity in the hindbrain. These HOX/PBC sites are positioned near a conserved kreisler-binding site (KrA) that is involved in activating early expression in r5 and r6, but their activity is independent of kreisler. This work demonstrates that separate elements are involved in initiating and maintaining Hoxa3 expression during hindbrain segmentation, and that it is regulated in a manner different from Hoxb3 in later stages. Together, these findings add further strength to the emerging importance of positive auto- and cross-regulatory interactions between Hox genes as a general mechanism for maintaining their correct spatial patterns in the vertebrate nervous system.

Key words: Hox genes, Hindbrain, Segmentation, Transgenic mice, Chick embryos, Auto/cross-regulation, Pbx, Meis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S. Bel-Vialar, N. Itasaki, and R. Krumlauf
Initiating Hox gene expression: in the early chick neural tube differential sensitivity to FGF and RA signaling subdivides the HoxB genes in two distinct groups
Development, March 13, 2003; 129(22): 5103 - 5115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001