|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
1 Institute of Zoology, Biocenter/Pharmacenter, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
2 Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Indiana University, Jordan Hall A507, Bloomington, IN 47405-6801, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: frank.hirth{at}unibas.ch)
Accepted September 12, 2001
Hox genes encode evolutionarily conserved transcription factors involved in the specification of segmental identity during embryonic development. This specification of identity is thought to be directed by differential Hox gene action, based on differential spatiotemporal expression patterns, protein sequence differences, interactions with co-factors and regulation of specific downstream genes. During embryonic development of the Drosophila brain, the Hox gene labial is required for the regionalized specification of the tritocerebral neuromere; in the absence of labial, the cells in this brain region do not acquire a neuronal identity and major axonal pathfinding deficits result. We have used genetic rescue experiments to investigate the functional equivalence of the Drosophila Hox gene products in the specification of the tritocerebral neuromere. Using the Gal4-UAS system, we first demonstrate that the labial mutant brain phenotype can be rescued by targeted expression of the Labial protein under the control of CNS-specific labial regulatory elements. We then show that under the control of these CNS-specific regulatory elements, all other Drosophila Hox gene products, except Abdominal-B, are able to efficiently replace Labial in the specification of the tritocerebral neuromere. We also observe a correlation between the rescue efficiency of the Hox proteins and the chromosomal arrangement of their encoding loci. Our results indicate that, despite considerably diverged sequences, most Hox proteins are functionally equivalent in their ability to replace Labial in the specification of neuronal identity. This suggests that in embryonic brain development, differences in Hox gene action rely mainly on cis-acting regulatory elements and not on Hox protein specificity.
Key words: labial, Hox proteins, Brain development, Genetic rescue, Drosophila
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Coiffier, B. Charroux, and S. Kerridge Common functions of central and posterior Hox genes for the repression of head in the trunk of Drosophila Development, January 15, 2008; 135(2): 291 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Hueber, D. Bezdan, S. R. Henz, M. Blank, H. Wu, and I. Lohmann Comparative analysis of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila Development, January 15, 2007; 134(2): 381 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G. Sprecher, R. Urbach, G. M. Technau, F. M. Rijli, H. Reichert, and F. Hirth The columnar gene vnd is required for tritocerebral neuromere formation during embryonic brain development of Drosophila Development, November 1, 2006; 133(21): 4331 - 4339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Hutchinson and J. S. Eisen Islet1 and Islet2 have equivalent abilities to promote motoneuron formation and to specify motoneuron subtype identity Development, June 1, 2006; 133(11): 2137 - 2147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Ebner, C. Cabernard, M. Affolter, and S. Merabet Recognition of distinct target sites by a unique Labial/Extradenticle/Homothorax complex Development, April 1, 2005; 132(7): 1591 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Miguel-Aliaga and S. Thor Segment-specific prevention of pioneer neuron apoptosis by cell-autonomous, postmitotic Hox gene activity Development, December 15, 2004; 131(24): 6093 - 6105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Fares, D. Bezemer, A. Moya, and I. Marin Selection on Coding Regions Determined Hox7 Genes Evolution Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2003; 20(12): 2104 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
