spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 21, 2003
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00606


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dekens, M. P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nüsslein-Volhard, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dekens, M. P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nüsslein-Volhard, C.
Development 130, 3907-3916 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 The Company of Biologists Limited

The maternal-effect gene futile cycle is essential for pronuclear congression and mitotic spindle assembly in the zebrafish zygote

Marcus P. S. Dekens{dagger}, Francisco J. Pelegri*, Hans-Martin Maischein and Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard

Max-Planck Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Abteilung Genetik, Spemannstrasse 35, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

{dagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: marcus.dekens{at}tuebingen.mpg.de)

Accepted 6 May 2003

Embryos have been successfully used for the general study of the cell cycle. Although there are significant differences between the early embryonic and the somatic cell cycle in vertebrates, the existence of specialised factors that play a role during the early cell cycles has remained elusive. We analysed a lethal recessive maternal-effect mutant, futile cycle (fue), isolated in a maternal-effect screen for nuclear division defects in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). The pronuclei fail to congress in zygotes derived from homozygous fue mothers. In addition, a defect in the formation of chromosomal microtubules prevents mitotic spindle assembly and thus chromosome segregation in fue zygotes. However, centrosomal functions do not appear to be affected in fue embryos, suggesting this mutant blocks a subset of microtubule functions. Cleavage occurs normally for several divisions resulting in many anucleate cells, thus showing that nuclear- and cell division can be uncoupled genetically. Therefore, we propose that in mitotic spindle assembly chromosome-dependent microtubule nucleation is essential for the coupling of nuclear and cell division.

Key words: Maternal-effect mutants, Pronuclear congression, Mitotic spindle, Cell cycle, Zebrafish




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
J. R. Mathias, M. E. Dodd, K. B. Walters, J. Rhodes, J. P. Kanki, A. T. Look, and A. Huttenlocher
Live imaging of chronic inflammation caused by mutation of zebrafish Hai1
J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2007; 120(19): 3372 - 3383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. L. Pfaff, C. T. Straub, K. Chiang, D. M. Bear, Y. Zhou, and L. I. Zon
The Zebra fish cassiopeia Mutant Reveals that SIL Is Required for Mitotic Spindle Organization
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2007; 27(16): 5887 - 5897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Feitsma, M. C. Leal, P. B. Moens, E. Cuppen, and R. W. Schulz
Mlh1 Deficiency in Zebrafish Results in Male Sterility and Aneuploid as Well as Triploid Progeny in Females
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1561 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. Meng, J. Luo, C. Li, and W. H Kinsey
Role of Src homology 2 domain-mediated PTK signaling in mouse zygotic development.
Reproduction, September 1, 2006; 132(3): 413 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
M. Glotzer
Cleavage furrow positioning
J. Cell Biol., February 2, 2004; 164(3): 347 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003