|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 1 October 2003
doi: 10.1242/dev.00867
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jvincen{at}nimr.mrc.ac.uk)
Accepted 14 August 2003
In Drosophila embryos, segment boundaries form at the posterior edge of each stripe of engrailed expression. We have used an HRP-CD2 transgene to follow by transmission electron microscopy the cell shape changes that accompany boundary formation. The first change is a loosening of cell contact at the apical side of cells on either side of the incipient boundary. Then, the engrailed-expressing cells flanking the boundary undergo apical constriction, move inwards and adopt a bottle morphology. Eventually, grooves regress, first on the ventral side, then laterally. We noted that groove formation and regression are contemporaneous with germ band retraction and shortening, respectively, suggesting that these rearrangements could also contribute to groove morphology. The cellular changes accompanying groove formation require that Hedgehog signalling be activated, and, as a result, a target of Ci expressed, at the posterior of each boundary (obvious targets like stripe and rhomboid appear not to be involved). In addition, Engrailed must be expressed at the anterior side of each boundary, even if Hedgehog signalling is artificially maintained. Thus, there are distinct genetic requirements on either side of the boundary. In addition, Wingless signalling at the anterior of the domains of engrailed (and hedgehog) expression represses groove formation and thus ensures that segment boundaries form only at the posterior.
Key words: Drosophila embryos, Segmentation, Boundaries, hedgehog, engrailed, TEM
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Vincent, N. Perrimon, and J. D. Axelrod Hedgehog and Wingless stabilize but do not induce cell fate during Drosophila dorsal embryonic epidermal patterning Development, August 15, 2008; 135(16): 2767 - 2775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Clements, Z. Lu, W. J. Gehring, I. A. Meinertzhagen, and P. Callaerts Central projections of photoreceptor axons originating from ectopic eyes in Drosophila PNAS, July 1, 2008; 105(26): 8968 - 8973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. R. Sanders, M. Patel, and J. W. Mahaffey The Drosophila Gap Gene giant Has an Anterior Segment Identity Function Mediated Through disconnected and teashirt Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 441 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Mulinari, M. P. Barmchi, and U. Hacker DRhoGEF2 and Diaphanous Regulate Contractile Force during Segmental Groove Morphogenesis in the Drosophila Embryo Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2008; 19(5): 1883 - 1892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. C. F. Homem and M. Peifer Diaphanous regulates myosin and adherens junctions to control cell contractility and protrusive behavior during morphogenesis Development, March 15, 2008; 135(6): 1005 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. H. Millard and P. Martin Dynamic analysis of filopodial interactions during the zippering phase of Drosophila dorsal closure Development, February 15, 2008; 135(4): 621 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Stevens, E. M. Rogers, L. M. Koontz, D. T. Fox, C. C.F. Homem, S. H. Nowotarski, N. B. Artabazon, and M. Peifer Using Bcr-Abl to Examine Mechanisms by Which Abl Kinase Regulates Morphogenesis in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 378 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Zhang, T. Cagatay, M. Amanai, M. Zhang, J. Kline, D. H. Castrillon, R. Ashfaq, O. K. Oz, and K. A. Wharton Jr. Viable Mice with Compound Mutations in the Wnt/Dvl Pathway Antagonists nkd1 and nkd2 Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2007; 27(12): 4454 - 4464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gates, J. P. Mahaffey, S. L. Rogers, M. Emerson, E. M. Rogers, S. L. Sottile, D. Van Vactor, F. B. Gertler, and M. Peifer Enabled plays key roles in embryonic epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila Development, June 1, 2007; 134(11): 2027 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Larsen, X. Franch-Marro, V. Hartenstein, C. Alexandre, and J.-P. Vincent An efficient promoter trap for detection of patterned gene expression and subsequent functional analysis in Drosophila PNAS, November 21, 2006; 103(47): 17813 - 17817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. D. Shippy, C. D. Rogers, R. W. Beeman, S. J. Brown, and R. E. Denell The Tribolium castaneum Ortholog of Sex combs reduced Controls Dorsal Ridge Development Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 297 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Waldrop, C.-C. Chan, T. Cagatay, S. Zhang, R. Rousset, J. Mack, W. Zeng, M. Fish, M. Zhang, M. Amanai, et al. An Unconventional Nuclear Localization Motif Is Crucial for Function of the Drosophila Wnt/Wingless Antagonist Naked Cuticle Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 331 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. P. Levi, A. S. Ghabrial, and M. A. Krasnow Drosophila talin and integrin genes are required for maintenance of tracheal terminal branches and luminal organization Development, June 15, 2006; 133(12): 2383 - 2393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
