QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 5 January 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.01605

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dev.01605v1 132/3/515    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brent, A. E. Articles by Tabin, C. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brent, A. E. Articles by Tabin, C. J.

Genetic analysis of interactions between the somitic muscle, cartilage and tendon cell lineages during mouse development

¹ Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
² Institute of Physiological Chemistry, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 06099, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: tabin{at}genetics.med.harvard.edu)

Accepted 26 November 2004

Proper formation of the musculoskeletal system requires the coordinated development of the muscle, cartilage and tendon lineages arising from the somitic mesoderm. During early somite development, muscle and cartilage emerge from two distinct compartments, the myotome and sclerotome, in response to signals secreted from surrounding tissues. As the somite matures, the tendon lineage is established within the dorsolateral sclerotome, adjacent to and beneath the myotome. We examine interactions between the three lineages by observing tendon development in mouse mutants with genetically disrupted muscle or cartilage development. Through analysis of embryos carrying null mutations in Myf5 and Myod1, hence lacking both muscle progenitors and differentiated muscle, we identify an essential role for the specified myotome in axial tendon development, and suggest that absence of tendon formation in Myf5/Myod1 mutants results from loss of the myotomal FGF proteins, which depend upon Myf5 and Myod1 for their expression, and are required, in turn, for induction of the tendon progenitor markers. Our analysis of Sox5/Sox6 double mutants, in which the chondroprogenitors are unable to differentiate into cartilage, reveals that the two cell fates arising from the sclerotome, axial tendon and cartilage are alternative lineages, and that cartilage differentiation is required to actively repress tendon development in the dorsolateral sclerotome.

Key words: Somite, Syndetome, Sclerotome, Myotome, Tendon, Scleraxis, Myf5, Myod1 (MyoD) Sox5, Sox6, FGF, Mouse

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. D. Murchison, B. A. Price, D. A. Conner, D. R. Keene, E. N. Olson, C. J. Tabin, and R. Schweitzer Regulation of tendon differentiation by scleraxis distinguishes force-transmitting tendons from muscle-anchoring tendons Development, July 15, 2007; 134(14): 2697 - 2708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Grifone, J. Demignon, C. Houbron, E. Souil, C. Niro, M. J. Seller, G. Hamard, and P. Maire Six1 and Six4 homeoproteins are required for Pax3 and Mrf expression during myogenesis in the mouse embryo Development, May 1, 2005; 132(9): 2235 - 2249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. Smith, D. Sweetman, M. Patterson, S. M. Keyse, and A. Munsterberg Feedback interactions between MKP3 and ERK MAP kinase control scleraxis expression and the specification of rib progenitors in the developing chick somite Development, March 15, 2005; 132(6): 1305 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]