Roles of the Homothorax/Meis/Prep homolog UNC-62 and the Exd/Pbx homologs CEH-20 and CEH-40 in C. elegans embryogenesis
Kimberly Van Auken1,*,
Daniel Weaver1,
,
Barbara Robertson1,
Meera Sundaram2,
Tassa Saldi1,
Lois Edgar1,
Ulrich Elling1,
,
Monica Lee1,
Queta Boese1,
and
William B. Wood1,¶
1 Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of
Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347, USA
2 Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6145, USA
* Present address: Department of Pediatrics, UCHSC, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, Denver,
CO 80262, USA
Present address: Array BioPharma, 3200 Walnut St., Boulder, CO 80301,
USA
Present address: EMBL Heidelberg, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg D-69117,
Germany
Present address: Dharmacon Research, 1376 Miners Drive, Lafayette, CO 80026,
USA

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Physical map of deletion and inversion breakpoints in the vicinity of the
unc-62 promoter, showing numbered regions predicted to include
possible regulatory elements (see Discussion). Exon sizes are not to
scale.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. unc-62 molecular cloning, transcript structure and sequence
comparisons. (A) Genetic and physical maps of the unc-62 region on
LGV. Genetic mapping placed unc-62 on the left arm of LGV, between
two strain-specific polymorphisms stP3 and RW#L63 and in the
region uncovered by deficiency sDf27 but not sDf50. Cosmids
mapped to this region by the C. elegans genome consortium are shown
below. unc-62 putative regulatory sequences and coding sequence
reside on cosmids T08H10 and T28F12, respectively; both the regulatory and
coding sequences are included in the fosmid clone H06N16. (B) Structure of
unc-62 transcripts and locations of mutant lesions. unc-62
produces four alternatively spliced transcripts that differ in the choice of
the first exon (1a or 1b) and the seventh exon, which is the first exon of the
homeobox region (7a or 7b). The HM domain is encoded by exons 2, 3, 4 and 5,
while the TALE homeodomain is encoded by exons 7a or 7b, 8 and 9. Locations of
the point mutations t2012 and e644, the deletions
s472 and ct344, and the left inversion breakpoint of
e917 are indicated (see Fig.
6 for a more precise map of the rearrangements). (C,D) Sequence
similarities of the conserved UNC-62, Homothorax, and murine Meis1 HM and
homeodomains, respectively. Dashes indicate identical residues.
|
|

View larger version (141K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Late embryonic and larval arrest phenotypes resulting from five
unc-62 alleles. Animals in row A are homozygous mutant progeny of
heterozygous unc-62/+ hermaphrodites; those in rows B-E are progeny
of homozygous mutant hermaphrodites. Alleles are indicated in each panel. Each
allele results in a range of phenotypes represented by the individuals
shown.
|
|

View larger version (156K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Aberrant organization of early embryonic dorsal hypodermal and seam cell
precursors and the resulting differentiated cells in unc-62 mutant
embryos. Scale bars represent 10 µm. (A-D) Nomarski images of embryos
(dorsal or ventral view, dorsal focal plane, anterior leftwards) that were
lineaged to identify cells and photographed about 4 hours post-fertilization
(22-25°C). Precursors of hypodermal cells derived from the C lineage and
seam cells derived from V lineages are positioned as indicated. (A) Wild-type
embryo. Note that dorsal C-derived hypodermal precursors are flanked by
V-lineage cells. (Although this embryo is shown approximately one division
earlier than the other embryos, the relative position of dorsal midline C
hypodermal cells and lateral V precursors is already established at this time,
and does not change.) (B) s472 mutant embryo. Some of the C
hypodermal precursors lie abnormally ventral to this focal plane, and are not
visible. (C) t2012 mutant embryo. (D) ct344 mutant embryo.
Embryos in B-D are about one division later than the embryo in A. Relative
positions of the C- and V-derived hypodermal cells are aberrant in the three
mutants. (E-N) Nomarski and fluorescent images (lateral views, surface focal
plane, anterior leftwards) of embryos and larvae expressing JAM-1::GFP, a
marker for hypodermal cell junctions. (E,F) Wild-type newly hatched L1,
showing the normal expression of JAM-1 at the borders of the row of seam
cells. The dorsal and ventral hypodermal cells have fused into syncytia,
showing no cell boundaries. (G,H) s472 newly hatched L1. There are
few outlined cells, which do not show a contiguous seam cell pattern. (I,J)
e644 L1, with a more normal pattern but some dorsal hypodermal cells
that have not fused. (K,L) t2012 newly hatched L1, with disconnected
seam cells. (M,N) ct344 late embryo, with few, abnormally large seam
cells.
|
|

View larger version (103K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Examples of aberrant vulval development in ku234 mutant L4
hermaphrodites. (A) Wild type. (B) ku234: descendants of P7.p (arrow)
have not joined in the main invagination. About 50% of ku234 exhibit
this phenotype (non-Vul-abnormal), while the rest have apparently normal
vulvae. (C) ku234/s472: descendents of P7.p (arrow) appear
non-vulval. About a third of the non-Dpy segregants from ku234
dpy-11/unc-62(s472) unc-46 exhibited this semi-vulvaless phenotype, which
is only slightly more severe that the non-Vul-abnormal phenotype in B. The
remaining non-Dpy animals were either non-Vul-abnormal or normal. (D)
ku234/sDf27: posterior Pn.p cells appear to be generating vulval-like
descendants near the tail (arrow). This phenotype was seen only occasionally.
As in C, about a third of the non-Dpy segregants of ku234 dpy-11/sDf27
unc-46 exhibited the semi-vulvaless phenotype, while the rest were
non-Vul-abnormal or normal.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002