spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00154


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, G.
Right arrow Articles by Niehrs, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, G.
Right arrow Articles by Niehrs, C.

Kremen proteins interact with Dickkopf1 to regulate anteroposterior CNS patterning

Gary Davidson, Bingyu Mao, Ivan del Barco Barrantes and Christof Niehrs*

Division of Molecular Embryology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany



View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sequence comparison of Krm proteins. (A) Alignment of Krm1 and Krm2 protein sequences from Xenopus (X) and mouse (m). The Kringle, WSC, CUB and transmembrane (TM) domains are highlighted and conserved amino acids are shown in white (within coloured domains) or red. (B) Krm homology tree and matrix showing overview of homology and amino acid identity, respectively, between the Xenopus, mouse and human Krm proteins.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Expression analysis of Krm1 and Krm2 in the mouse. (A) Relative expression levels of mouse Krm1 and Krm2 in indicated tissues, as analysed by RT-PCR. Histone H4 was used as reference for sample normalisation. (B) Krm1 whole-mount in situ hybridisation of early (E8) and late (E8.5) headfold stage mouse embryos. (C) Whole-mount in situ hybridisation of E10.5 mouse embryos for Krm1 and Krm2 (top). Dissected anterior limb buds are shown in bottom panels, with arrows indicating staining in the apical ectodermal ridge (AER). br, branchial arches; f, forebrain; fl, forelimb; h, hindbrain; hl, hindlimb; m, midbrain; ms, mesanephros; np, nasal placode; ot, otic vesicle; ov, optic vesicle.

 


View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Expression of Krm genes during Xenopus embryogenesis. (A) Developmental timecourse expression, as analysed by RT-PCR, at the indicated stages. Histone H4 was used for cDNA sample normalisation. (B-F) Spatial expression pattern of krm1 in Xenopus embryos, as analysed by whole-mount in situ hybridisation. (B) Control hybridisation of a stage 14 embryo using krm1 sense riboprobe. (C) Stage 14 embryo showing lateral neural plate expression, strongest in the anterior region. (D) Frontal view of late neurula, dorsal towards the top. (E) Sagittal midline cut of embryo shown in I, revealing expression in prechordal plate (pp). (F) Tailbud embryo showing krm1 expression in fin mesenchyme, hatching gland (hg) and notochord (nc, see also inset of cross-section). (G-M) Spatial expression pattern of krm2. (G) Mid gastrula (stage 11) embryo showing expression in marginal zone but absence from dorsal region. Vegetal view, dorsal towards the top. (H) Early-mid neurula (stage 14) embryo showing lateral neural plate expression. Dorsal view, anterior towards the top. (I,J) krm2 expression in anterior mesoderm. Vibrotome section (50 µm) of horizontally cut stage15 embryos (I) and sagittally cut stage14 embryos (J). The inserts show the plane of the section, indicated by a horizontal line. Arrow in I indicates expression in anterior mesoderm. (K) Frontal view of late neurula embryo (stage 18) showing anterior expression pattern. Dorsal towards the top. (L) Sagittal midline cut of embryo shown in K, revealing expression in prechordal plate (pp) tissue. Anterior is towards the left, dorsal is towards the top. (M) Lateral view of tailbud (stage 28) embryo showing expression in fin mesenchyme, dorsal part of otic vesicle (ov), hatching gland (hg), branchial arches (br) and pronephric duct (pnd, see also inset in cross-section).

 


View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Krm overexpression analysis. (A-G) Axis duplication assay performed by injection of indicated mRNAs into two opposite blastomeres at the four-cell stage. Amounts injected were 10 (Xwnt8), 200 (LRP6), 5 (Xdkk1) and 100 (mkrm2) pg per blastomere. (H-J) Both krm2 (I) and dkk1 (J) anteriorise Xenopus embryos, whereas preprolactin (ppl) control has no effect (H). mRNA (375 pg Xkrm2 or 50 pg Xdkk1 per blastomere) was injected into all blastomeres of four-cell stage embryos. (K) krm2 and dkk1 upregulate the anterior neural marker genes otx2 and XAG1 and the pan neural marker NCAM in animal cap RT-PCR assays. mRNA (500 pg of Xkrm2 and 200 pg Xdkk1) was injected in each blastomere of four-cell stage embryos. Actin was used to confirm absence of mesoderm in animal cap explants. -RT, minus reverse transcription control; H4, histone H4 used for RT-PCR sample normalisation. (L-N) krm2 blocks posteriorising Wnt activity. (M) 50 pg of pCSKA-Xwnt8 DNA injected into each animal blastomere of eight-cell stage embryos results in loss of head structures (70% headless, n=26). (N) Co-injecting 250 pg Xkrm2 mRNA with XWnt8 DNA completely rescues this phenotype (0% headless, n=46). (O-Q) krm2 rescues cyclopia induced by inhibitory anti-Dkk1 antibodies. mRNA [250pg of ppl (O,P) or krm2 (Q)] was injected into all blastomeres of four-cell stage embryos and the same embryos were then injected with either PBS (O) or 250 ng of anti-Dkk1 antibody at stage 9 (P,Q). Cyclopia as in P (65%, n=34) was completely rescued by krm2 injection (0%, n=40). Frontal views of embryos in O-Q are shown on the right.

 


View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Krm is required for anterior CNS formation during Xenopus embryogenesis. (A) Krm morpholino oligonucleotides (Mo) act specifically to inhibit translation of their cognate cDNA construct when overexpressed in embryos. mRNA (750pg of both C-terminal V5 tagged krm2 and C-terminal HA tagged krm1) was co-injected equatorially into both blastomeres of two-cell stage embryos. The same embryos were then injected with 2.5 ng of the indicated morpholinos in all four vegetal blastomeres at the eight-cell stage and harvested at stage 11. Tagged Krm proteins were visualised by western blot analysis using either anti-V5 IgG (Krm2, top panel) or anti-HA (Krm 1, middle panel). A crossreacting protein band from the anti-HA western is shown as a loading control (bottom panel). (B-D) Krm proteins are required for normal head formation. All four animal blastomeres of eight-cell stage embryos were injected with either 5 ng of control Mo (B), 2.5 ng each of krm1 + krm2 (krm1/2) Mo (C), or co-injected with krm1/2 Mo and 100pg krm2 DNA (D) and allowed to develop for 4 days. (B) Embryos injected with control Mo show no abnormalities. (C) Embryos injected with krm1/2 Mo show microcephaly and slight shortening of the trunk/tail region (85%, n=400). (D) Rescue of krm1/2 Mo phenotype by co-injection of pCS-Xkrm2 DNA. Rescue, similar to that shown in D, was seen in 25% (n=300) of co-injected embryos. (E-H) Krm is required for formation of anterior neural tissue. (E,F) bf1 in situ hybridisation of stage 25 embryos marks clear reduction of forebrain tissue (red asterisk) in krm1/2 Mo injected embryo. Frontal views of head region are included at centre-top of panels. (G,H) Double bf1/en2 in situ hybridisation of stage 16 embryos injected in one dorsal blastomere at the four-cell stage with lacZ mRNA (used as tracer) and either 5 ng control Mo (G) or krm1/2 Mo (H). A reduction of the bf1 expression, but normal en2 expression was seen in 40% (n=60) of krm1/2 Mo-injected embryos. (I-T) Krm and Dkk1 cooperate in head formation. Embryos were injected in all four animal blastomeres at the eight-cell stage with 5 ng control Mo (I,M) or 2.5 ng each of krm1/2 Mo (J,N and L,P). At stage 9, the same embryos were injected with either PBS (I,M and J,N) or 100 ng anti-Dkk1 antibody (K,O and L,P) into the blastocoel and allowed to develop for 3 days. Note the similarity in phenotypes for krm1/2 Mo and anti-Dkk antibody injections (compare especially N and O with M) and their synergy when combined (L,P). (M-P) The corresponding frontal views of embryos shown laterally in I-L. No headless embryos (n=50-110) were observed in I-K, but 40% (n=70) were headless in L. (Q-S) bf1 in situ hybridisation of late neurula embryos injected as described above with control Mo (Q), krm1/2 Mo (R), anti-Dkk1 (S) and krm1/2 Mo + anti-Dkk1 (T). Compared with the controls (Q), reduction/loss of bf1 expression domain was seen in 40/0% (R, n=200), 15/0% (S, n=35) and 40/60% (T, n=25) of embryos.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Canonical Wnt pathway inhibition in AP patterning. (A) Epistatic hierarchy of Wnt/ß-catenin signalling pathway components involved in vertebrate AP patterning. Components in red represent factors for which loss-of-function studies have provided direct evidence for a role in AP neural patterning: Dkk1 (Glinka et al., 1998Go; Mukhopadhyay et al., 2001Go), Krm (present study), Wnt8 (Erter et al., 2001Go; Levken et al., 2001Go), LRP6 (Pinson et al., 2000Go), Axin (Heisenberg et al., 2001Go; van de Water et al., 2001Go), ß-catenin (Heasman et al., 2000Go) and Tcf3 (Kim et al., 2000Go). For clarity, some components of the pathway have been omitted. (B,C) Proposed molecular interactions for membrane linked Wnt pathway components. Krm, Dkk1 and LRP6 form a ternary complex (B), which disrupts Wnt/LRP6 signalling (C). Proteoglycans have been omitted for simplicity.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002