spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00200


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lemaire, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lemaire, P.

A conserved role for the MEK signalling pathway in neural tissue specification and posteriorisation in the invertebrate chordate, the ascidian Ciona intestinalis

Clare Hudson1,*,{dagger}, Sébastien Darras1, Danielle Caillol1, Hitoyoshi Yasuo2 and Patrick Lemaire1,{dagger}

1 Laboratoire de Génétique et Physiologie du Développement. IBDM. CNRS/INSERM/Université de la Méditerranée/AP de Marseille. Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Case 907. 13288, Marseille Cedex 9, France.
2 Unité de Biologie du Développement (UMR 7009), CNRS/UPMC, Station Zoologique, Observatoire Océanologique, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
* Present address: Unité de Biologie du Développement (UMR 7009), CNRS/UPMC, Station Zoologique, Observatoire Océanologique, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France



View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Expression of Ci-otx in different lineages in control and PD184352-treated embryos. (A) Control embryo; dorsal view, anterior upwards; 100% positive, n>=100. (B) PD184352-treated embryo; 100%, n=302. The size of the expression domain was variable. (C-J) cytochalasin cleavage-arrested embryos. (C,G) Schematic representation of 64-cell stage embryo showing fates of each blastomere with a spot of colour, key is in the top left-hand corner. Blastomeres are also indicated on the cleavage arrested embryos with an appropriate coloured dot. (D,H) Control-cleavage arrested, n=418. (E,F,I,J) Cleavage-arrested embryo+PD184352, n=379. (D) Control a-line (100% expression). Expression was also seen in the anterior epidermis precursor, a7.11 (99%). (E,F) +PD. Expression was generally lost in a-line 60% (E), persisting in 40% of cases (F). Individual percentages for four independent experiments are 85%, 21%, 18%, 0% positive (experiments 1-4 respectively). Thus, in three out of four experiments, expression of Ci-otx in a-line cells was largely inhibited. In the experiment where embryos expressed Ci-otx in a-line in 85% of cases, the same batch of embryos expressed neither Ci-ETR-1 nor Ci-{alpha} tubulin in a-line cells. (H) Control A-line: 99% positive in A7.4; 0% positive in A7.8. (I,J) +PD A-line: 100% positive in A7.4; 75% positive for A7.8. Notochord expression: 40% (individual percentages for experiments 1-4; 85%, 20%, 19%, and 2%). Embryos with notochord expression also had low levels of expression in anterior endoderm. The variability of the Ci-otx expression domain in PD184352-treated embryos in a-line and notochord was batch dependent and higher concentrations of inhibitor had little effect on the type of phenotype found. Embryos treated with U0126 gave similar results. (K-P') DiI labelling showing difference in Ci-otx expression in control embryos and embryos treated with PD184352 from the eight-cell stage onwards. (K-P) DiI label; (K'-P') in situ hybridisation. Nuclear stain facilitates comparison between K-P and K'-P'. Embryos in K'-P' appear slightly smaller because of shrinkage during in situ hybridisation. The blastomere that was labelled with DiI is indicated on the left of the panels. In all cases both left and right blastomeres were labelled. Controls on left, PD184352-treated embryos on right panels. n=10-20 for each. It can be seen that embryos treated with PD184352 fail to gastrulate, with cells maintaining their relative positions from before the gastrula stage.

 


View larger version (82K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. PD184352 and dnRAS mRNA injections block FGF/MEK-dependent events in Ciona embryos. (A) control embryo at larval stage. (B) Overall morphology of a dnRAS mRNA injected embryo. (C) Overall morphology of a PD184352-treated embryo. (D-G) Cibra in situ hybridisation. (D) Control embryos; (E) embryos injected with dnRas mRNA; F) control embryo, dorsal view with anterior upwards; (G) embryo cultured in PD184352 from the eight-cell stage onwards (100% negative, n=37). (H-L) Ci-otx in situ hybridisation. (H) Control embryo dorsal view with anterior upwards; (I-L) a4.2 explants cultured in (I) BSA/sea water, (J) BSA/sea water plus 2 µM PD184352, (K) 2 µM PD184352+100 ng/ml bFGF or (L) FGF alone.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Expression of Ci-otx, Ci-ETR-1 and acetylated tubulin in animal cells of embryos placed in MEK inhibitor at various time points. (A-G) Anti-tubulin antibodies label epidermal sensory neurones (white arrowheads) and neurones (yellow arrows). Embryos were placed in inhibitor at the stages indicated on each panel. (E) Bright-field view of embryo placed in inhibitor at neural plate stage, showing absence of palp and pigment cell formation. (F,G) Control embryo. (H) Detection of non-epidermal tubulin-positive neurones in embryos placed in MEK inhibitor at the time points shown along the x-axis. 110+0.5H represents 30 minutes after 110-cell stage at 17°C; 110+1H represents 1 hour after 110-cell stage; neur. pl., neural plate stage, ~1 hour and 45 minutes after 110-cell stage. Detection of neurones is expressed as a percentage. (C) An example of `neurones in both head and tail'. (D) An example of a `good network'. Experiments with U0126 produced similar results. (I) Embryos were cleavage-arrested at the 64-cell stage and placed in inhibitor at the time points (~30 minute intervals at 17°C) shown along the x-axis. e32, early 32-cell stage; 132, late 32-cell stage. At neurula stage, embryos were scored for expression of Ci-ETR-1 and Ci-otx in a-line sensory vesicle precursors. The percentage of embryos showing expression of each marker is indicated on the graph. At least 100 embryos were scored for each time point. (J) Summary of the gradual acquisition of neural fates in a-line neural precursors. Time of application of PD184352 shown.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Expression of Ci-ETR-1 and Ci-Epi-1 at the neurula stage in embryos treated with or without PD184352 from the eight-cell stage onwards. (A,B) Schematic representation of 64-cell stage embryo showing fates of each blastomere with a spot of colour, key on left. Neural blastomere names are shown. Blastomere identities are also indicated on the cleavage-arrested embryos with an appropriate coloured dot. (C-L) In situ hybridisation was carried out for the genes indicated on the left of the panels. Cleaving embryos are shown in the left-hand panel. Embryos in which cleavage has been arrested from the 64-cell stage are shown in the middle and right hand panels. Application of PD184352 is indicated on the right: left-hand panels, dorsal views with anterior upwards (PD184352 treated embryos are effectively a vegetal view); middle panels, animal views; right-hand panels, vegetal views. Only animal views are shown for Ci-Epi-1 because this gene is not expressed in vegetal cells. (C-H) Ci-ETR-1. (C) Control, 100% positive, n>100. (D,E) Cleavage arrested control, n=156. (D) a-line, 100% positive. (E) A-line, 100% positive. (F) Cleaving embryo+PD184352, 100% positive, n=268. (G,H) Cleavage-arrested embryo+PD184352, n=271. (G) a-line, 0% expression. (H) A-line: 100% in A-line neural precursors; 96% in notochord. Expression of neural markers is detected in the notochord because of the conversion of notochord into neural cells in the absence of FGF or MEK signalling, as previously reported (see Introduction). Expression of Ci-{alpha} tubulin was similar, except low levels of expression were also detected in the anterior endoderm (not shown). (I-L) Ci-Epi-1. (I) Control, n>100. (J) Control cleavage-arrested embryo, n=55. (K) Cleaving embryo+PD184352, n=71. (L) Cleavage arrested+PD184352, n=42. Embryos treated with U0126 produced similar results.

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Loss of expression of early neural markers from embryos treated with MEK inhibitor from the eight-cell stage onwards. The developmental stage is indicated on the right of the panels. All panels show vegetal views, anterior upwards. (A-D) Ci-otx in situ hybridisation. (A,C) Control embryos. (B,D) +PD184352. Ci-otx expression is lost from a6.5 at the 44-cell stage (0% expression, n=269) (B) and from a-line neural cells at the 64-cell stage (0%, n=208) (D). Ci-otx expression is also lost in b6.5 derivatives (dorsal nerve cord, muscle, endoderm fates) and B-line endoderm. The latter may represent the loss of posterior endoderm reported previously (Kim and Nishida, 2001Go). The same results were observed with U0126. (E,F) Ci-ETR-1 in situ hybridisation. (E) Control embryo. (F) PD184352-treated embryos, expression of Ci-ETR-1 is lost in a-line cells, but persists in A-line (100%, n=30).

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Expression of neural markers in embryos treated with MEK inhibitor from the eight-cell stage onwards. Arrows indicate gene expression in palps. (A,A') Ci-HB9/Mnx. Late gastrula stage embryo; dorsal view, anterior upwards. Expression is lost in PD184352-treated embryos (+PD) in neural plate cells (n=174). (B-K) Control embryo; lateral view, dorsal upwards. (B'-K') PD184352-treated embryos. (B,B') Cihox5 (+PD, 0% expression, n=116). (C,C') Cilv38e16 (+PD, 0% expression, n=139). (D,D') Citb8a22 (+PD, 0% expression, n=36). (E,E') Ci-islet (+PD, 0% expression, n=20). Arrowhead indicates the visceral ganglion expression. (F,F') Ci-otx (+PD, 100% expression, n=80). (G,G') Ci-ETR-1 (+PD, 100% expression, n=108). Expression in tail epidermal sensory neurones was not affected (arrowheads). (H,H') Ci-gsx (control, 72% expression; +PD,46% expression, n=278). (I,I') 08C09 (+PD, 91% expression, n=103). (J,J') 24H09 (+PD, 0% expression, n=103). (K,K') Ci-TRP (+PD, 0% expression, n=30). In all cases where gene expression was lost, this was not simply a delay of expression, as the onset of gene expression was either much earlier than the stage shown, or loss of expression was verified at a later developmental stage. Similar results were obtained with U0126. (L-O) Dorsal views of embryos showing expression of Ci-ETR-1, 08C09, 24H09 and Ci-TRP to indicate relative expression domains along the anteroposterior axis. A bar indicates the posterior limit of the sensory vesicle. (P) DiI labelling of A7.4 at the 64-cell stage. At tailbud stages, label is seen in the posterior sensory vesicle (posterior to the pigment cells) and in the ventral tail nerve cord (not seen in this focal plane). (Q) DiI labelling of A7.8 at the 64-cell stage. At tailbud stages, label is seen in the visceral ganglion, lateral tail nerve cord and a few muscle cells (not visible in picture). (R) A schematic summary of the data shown in this figure. The central nervous system consists of a sensory vesicle, visceral ganglion and tail nerve cord. In black are the pigment cells. A-line cells are coloured grey. The relative expression domains along the anteroposterior axis of genes used in this figure is indicated. + and - indicate the expression status of the genes in PD184352-treated embryos.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Expression of Ci-ETR-1 and Ci-otx in vegetal cells of embryos placed in MEK inhibitor at various time points. Embryos were placed in cytochalasin B to arrest cell cleavage at the 64-cell stage. (A) Graph showing the percentage of embryos with expression of Ci-otx in A7.8 blastomeres in embryos placed in inhibitor at the time points shown along the x-axis. (B) Graph showing the percentage of expression in notochord precursors in embryos placed in inhibitor at the developmental time points shown along the x-axis. At the late 32-cell stage, one experiment showed 3% notochord expression, the other 99% expression. This is most likely to be due to slight differences in timing between the experiments.

 


View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. In situ immunohistochemical analysis of ERK activation in 32-cell stage Ciona embryos. (A,B) Vegetal view of early 32-cell stage. (C,D) Animal view of late 32-cell stage. (A,C) Control embryos. (B,D) Embryos treated with PD184352. A-line vegetal blastomeres (A6.4, A6.2) are shown outlined in yellow; a-line neural precursors (a6.5) in red; and b6.5, which also contains neural fate, in green.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003