spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00506


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yabe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hibi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yabe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hibi, M.

Ogon/Secreted Frizzled functions as a negative feedback regulator of Bmp signaling

Taijiro Yabe1, Takashi Shimizu1,2, Osamu Muraoka2, Young-Ki Bae1,2, Tsutomu Hirata1, Hideaki Nojima1, Atsushi Kawakami3, Toshio Hirano1,4 and Masahiko Hibi1,2,*

1 Department of Molecular Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
2 Laboratory for Vertebrate Axis Formation, Center for Developmental Biology, RIKEN, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
3 Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
4 Department of Frontier Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan



View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The ogon locus encodes a zebrafish homolog of secreted frizzled. (A) The positional cloning of the ogon gene. The numbers on the linkage map and the ends of the BAC and PAC clones indicate the number of recombinations in 2998 meiosis. (B) Amino acid sequence of zebrafish Ogon/Sizzled and alignment with Xenopus Sizzled. The cysteine-rich domain (CRD) is underlined. The position of Asp92 is indicated (red dot). (C) A phylogenic tree of secreted Frizzled-related proteins (FRPs). z, zebrafish; x, Xenopus; c, chick; m, mouse. (D) Mutations in the ogon/sizzled genome and the Sizzled proteins of the ogonrk1 and ogontm305 alleles. CRD is indicated by yellow boxes.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. sizzled is responsible for ogon. (A) Control 24 hpf embryo. (B) Embryos that received an injection of 5 ng of an antisense morpholino oligonucleotide for sizzled (szl MO) phenocopied the ogon mutant embryos (n=38/38). (D) Injection of 5 ng of control MO (szl 4mis MO, with four mispaired bases) did not have any significant effect (n=45/45). (C) Co-injection of 5 ng of szl MO and 10 ng of modified szl RNA, which contains four mispaired bases without codon changes in the MO recognition site, rescued the ogon phenotype (n=11/21). Rescue of maternal-zygotic (MZ) ogonrk1 by injection of wild-type szl RNA (also see Table 1). MZ ogonrk1 embryos (E) that received an injection of 10 pg of szl RNA displayed a dorsalized phenotype, normal phenotype (G) and weakly ventralized phenotype (F).

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Ogon/Sizzled is a dorsalizing factor. (A) Control 30 hpf embryo. (B) Injection of 100 pg of ogo/szl RNA dorsalized wild-type embryos. (C-E) chordin expression at the 80% epiboly stage. Lateral views with dorsal towards the right. Control (C). Injection of 100 pg of ogo/szl RNA (D) but not ogo/szltm305 RNA (E) elicited the ventral expansion of chordin (din) expression. (F,G) bmp2b/swirl (swr) expression at 80% epiboly stage. Lateral views with dorsal towards the right. Control (F). (G) Injection of 100 pg of ogo/szl RNA decreased the expression of bmp2b/swirl. (H-K) goosecoid (gsc) expression at the shield (H,I; animal pole views with dorsal towards the right) and 80% epiboly stages (J,K, dorsoanterior views). (H,J) Control. Injection of 100 pg of ogo/szl RNA did not affect gsc expression in the embryonic shield (I) or prechordal plate (K).

 


View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Ogon/Sizzled functions differently from the Wnt inhibitor Dkk1 and other Frps. (A) ogo/szl induced ventral expansion, but not anteriorization, of the neuroectoderm. Embryos that received injections of ogo/szl (100 pg), noggin1 (nog, 50 pg), dickkopf1 (dkk1, 50 pg) or Xcrescent (xcre, 600 pg) were fixed and stained with the forebrain-specific marker six3.2 and the mid-hindbrain boundary marker pax2.1/no isthmus. Lateral views with dorsal to the right. (B) Ogo/Szl does not inhibit Wnt8. One nanogram of ogo/szl RNA or 600 pg of Xenopus crescent RNA was co-injected with 40 pg of wnt8.1 RNA. Wnt8.1-dependent ectopic expression of bozozok (boz)/dharma (indicated by arrows) was inhibited by Xcrescent (n=53/58) but not by ogo/szl (n=9/67). Endogenous boz/dharma expression is indicated by arrowheads. (C-J) Effects of Xcre and dkk1 overexpression on szl morphant embryos. Embryos that received injections of szl MO (5 ng) or szl MO (5 ng) together with Xcre RNA (25 pg) or dkk1 RNA (12.5 pg) were fixed at shield (C-F) and 80% epiboly stages (G-J), and stained with gsc or ogo/szl, respectively. Xcre and dkk1 suppressed expansion of ogo/szl expression, which was observed in szl morphant embryos, but concomitantly elicited expansion of gsc at shield stage.

 


View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. ogon/sizzled expression. Expression of ogo/szl during zebrafish development: sphere (A), 30% epiboly (EP; B), shield (C), 80% epiboly (D), tailbud (TB; E), five-somite (5 ss; F) and mid-segmentation (17 hpf; G) stages. Lateral views with dorsal towards the right.

 


View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. ogon/sizzled is regulated by Bmp signaling. ogo/szl expression in wild-type embryos (A,E), swirltc300 (B,F) and dinott250 mutant embryos (C,G), and embryos that received injections of 200 pg of constitutively active Bmp receptor IA RNA (D,H) at the shield (A-D) and 80% epiboly (E-H) stages. Animal pole views with dorsal towards the right (A-D), and lateral views with dorsal towards the right (E-H).

 


View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Requirement for Chordin in Ogon/Sizzled-mediated Bmp inhibition. (A) Injection of ogo/szl RNA did not dorsalize the dino/dino homozygous embryos. Embryos obtained by crossing heterozygous dinott250 fish received injections of 200 pg of ogo/szl RNA. The wild-type and heterozygous din embryos (din/+) displayed dorsalized phenotypes, but the homozygous din embryos (din/din) displayed ventralized phenotypes at 24 hpf (din/din was confirmed by genotyping), which are typical phenotypes for the din/din embryos (right). (B) chordin expression was not regulated by ogo/szl in the absence of Chordin protein. Two hundred picograms of ogo/szl RNA or 50 pg of noggin1 RNA was injected into embryos from the din/+ cross, or embryos received an injection of 2 ng of chordin MO (din morphant). The embryos were fixed at the 80% epiboly stage and stained with the chordin probe. Lateral views, dorsal towards the right. The din mutant and din morphant embryos displayed reduced or an absence of lateral chordin expression. Overexpression of nog but not ogo/szl in these embryos rescued and expanded the lateral expression of chordin. (C) Ogo/Szl acts cooperatively with Chordin to dorsalize the embryos. Embryos from the din/+ cross received injections of 15 pg chordin RNA alone or 15 pg chordin RNA and 200 pg ogo/szl RNA. The embryos were fixed at the 80% epiboly stage and stained with a probe for fused somites (fss)/tbx24, which marks the paraxial mesoderm, followed by genotyping. fss expression in the chordin RNA-injected embryos was slightly rescued or ectopically expanded, compared with that in the uninjected din/din embryos, but was weaker than in the wild-type or din/+ embryos. fss expression was strongly expanded in the chordin and ogo/szl RNA-coinjected embryos.

 


View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. ogon does not enhance the chordino phenotypes. (A-G) Embryos obtained from crossing ogork1/+;dintt250/+ parents (crosses of five different parent pairs) were assigned to five groups by morphological inspection at 24 hpf. (A-E) Lateral views with anterior towards the left and (F,G) ventral views of tail region. The numbers of embryos in each morphological category and their genotypes are shown in Table 4. (B,F) ogo-like embryo, displaying typical ogo phenotypes: caudal cell accumulation (containing blood cells, arrowhead) and expansion of the ventral tail fin (the ventral tail fin was expanded laterally), but no reduction in anterior neuroectoderm. (C-E,G) din-like embryos, displaying a reduction in the anterior neuroectoderm and caudal cell accumulation (arrowhead). These embryos displayed variable phenotypes in the tail fin (arrows): loss (din1, C), reduction (din2, D) or expansion (din3, E,G) of the ventral tail fin. (H-M) Expression of eve1 and krox20 in the eight-somite stage wild-type, din, and ogo;din embryos. (H-J) Vegetal pole views with dorsal towards the top and (K-M) anterior-dorsal views. din mutant embryos show variable expansion of eve1 expression (I) and the additional ogo mutation did not enhance this expansion (J). The ogo mutation did not increase the reduction of krox20 expression, which marks rhombomeres 3 and 5, in the din mutant embryos (L,M).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003