spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00582


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L.
Right arrow Articles by Parada, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L.
Right arrow Articles by Parada, L. F.

Brn3a regulation of TrkA/NGF receptor expression in developing sensory neurons

Long Ma1, Lei Lei1, S. Raisa Eng3, Eric Turner2,3 and Luis F. Parada1,*

1 Center for Developmental Biology and Kent Waldrep Foundation Center for Basic Research on Nerve Growth and Regeneration, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9133, USA
2 San Diego VA Medical Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
3 Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA



View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Reduced TrkA mRNA in P0 Brn3a-null or double-null trigeminal ganglia. Low (A1-A4) and high (B1-B4) magnification pictures of TrkA mRNA in situ hybridization signal, showing that Brn3a-null (A3,B3) and double-null (A4,B4) ganglia have reduced TrkA mRNA compared with control (A1,B1) and Bax-null ganglia (A2,B2), respectively. As a control, (C1-C4) NCAM mRNA signal is similar in all four genotypes.

 


View larger version (148K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Reduced TrkA protein in P0 Brn3a-null or double-null trigeminal ganglia. Low (A1-A4) and high (B1-B4) magnification pictures of peripherin immunostaining, showing that all four genotypes have similar levels of peripherin in trigeminal ganglia. Low (C1-C4) and high (D1-D4) magnification pictures of TrkA immunostaining, showing that Brn3a-null (C3,D3) and double-null (C4,D4) ganglia have reduced TrkA protein compared with control (C1,D1) and Bax-null (C2,D2) ganglia, respectively. (E1-E4) Brn3a immunostaining showing that Brn3a-null (E3) and double-null (E4) ganglia lack nuclear Brn3a protein compared with control (E1) and Bax-null (E2) ganglia. Double-null ganglia are always larger and have more neurons than Brn3a-null ganglia.

 


View larger version (136K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Reduced TrkA enhancer activity in P0 Brn3a-null or double-null trigeminal ganglia. Low (A1-A4) and high (B1-B4) magnification pictures of ß-galactosidase activity driven by the TrkA minimal enhancer, showing that Brn3-null (A3,B3) and double-null (A4,B4) ganglia have reduced ß-galactosidase activity compared with control (A1,B1) and Bax-null (A2,B2) ganglia, respectively. (C1-C4, arrows) Individual ß-galactosidase positive cells from each genotype show apparently reduced ß-galactosidase activity in cell bodies of Brn3a-null (C3) and double-null (C4) ganglia, but normal activity in control (C1) and Bax-null (C2) ganglia. (D1-D4, arrows) A second set of ß-galactosidase-positive trigeminal ganglia neurons from an independent group of mice, showing that reduced TrkA enhancer activity in Brn3a-null (D3) and double-null (D4) ganglia is consistent, compared with control (D1) and Bax-null (D2) ganglia.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Summary of transgenic analysis of the wild-type TrkA minimal enhancer and TrkA minimal enhancers with one or both Brn3a-binding-site mutations. Note that the minimal enhancer that contains both Brn3a-binding-site mutations has apparently reduced activity in trigeminal ganglia. *The reported numbers include results from three stable TrkA-minimal-enhancer transgenic lines.

 


View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The TrkA minimal enhancer containing both Brn3a-binding-site mutations has reduced activity in trigeminal ganglia. Representative trigeminal ganglia ß-galactosidase activity driven by the wild-type TrkA minimal enhancer (A,E), by a TrkA minimal enhancer bearing a 5' Brn3a-binding-site mutation (B,F), by a TrkA minimal enhancer bearing a 3' Brn3a-binding-site mutation (C,G), and by a TrkA minimal enhancer bearing both Brn3a-site mutations (D,H,I) at E13.5 and E17.5. Only the TrkA minimal enhancer with both mutations caused severe reduction in enhancer activity at E13.5 and E17.5.

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Gel-shift and footprint assays define two Brn3a-binding sites in the TrkA minimal enhancer. (A) Illustration of six, overlapping, 100 bp fragments covering TrkA minimal enhancer and (B) gel-shift using a GST-Brn3a POU-domain fusion protein indicating that only the first and sixth fragments can bind Brn3a. (C,D) DNAse I footprint assays to define the Brn3a-binding sequences in the TrkA minimal enhancer. The 5' protected sequence is 5'-TCTAAGAGATCTATTAATTTCTC-3' (C) and the 3' protected sequence is 5'-TCACCTAACTTATTCCAAGTGACATGCACACCCTCTTAA-3' (D). (E,F, left panels) Gel-shift assays showing that the protected sequences in (C,D) compete with the first and sixth 100 bp fragments in (A,B) for GST-Brn3a POU-domain fusion-protein binding. (E,F, top panels) Protected sequences from (C,D) share (red boxes) an A/T-rich core sequence. The mutant sequences used in the competitive gel-shift assays (left panels) and the following transgenic analysis (Figs 5, 6) are shown in red. (E,F, right panels) Competitive gel-shift assays using either the wild-type or mutated Brn3a-binding sites, showing that mutated Brn3a-binding sites do not bind the GST-Brn3a POU-domain fusion protein (lane 8) and, unlike wild-type sites (lanes 1-4), do not compete with wild-type sites for binding (lanes 5-7). Arrows in E,F indicate the DNA-protein complexes.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003