doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00577
Modes of intercellular transcription factor movement in the Arabidopsis apex
Xuelin Wu1,
José R. Dinneny1,2,
Katrina M. Crawford3,
Yoon Rhee4,
Vitaly Citovsky4,
Patricia C. Zambryski3 and
Detlef Weigel1,5,*
1 Plant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla,
CA 92037, USA
2 Department of Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093,
USA
3 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley,
CA 94720, USA
4 Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, State University of New York,
Stony Brook, NY 11794-5215, USA
5 Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental
Biology, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany

View larger version (111K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Movement of TVCVMP:GFP, 2xGFP and NLS:2xGFP. Confocal images of
GFP fluorescence in inflorescence apices (A-C) and leaf epidermis (D-F) of
2-week-old ML1::TVCVMP:GFP (A,D), ML1::2xGFP
(B,E) and ML1::NLS:2xGFP (C,F) transgenic plants.
Inset in A shows that TVCVMP:GFP RNA is restricted to the L1, as
detected by in situ hybridization. In D-F, the GFP fluorescence channel is
overlaid with the transmissible light channel. TVCVMP:GFP is found in all
cells in the inflorescence apex (A), and it is associated with the cell wall
in a punctate pattern (D). 2xGFP forms a gradient of six to ten cells in
the apex, with the highest concentration in L1 (B). It is located in both the
nucleus and the cytoplasm (E). NLS:2xGFP can move efficiently only one
cell layer from the L1 in the apex (C), and it appears mostly nuclear (F).
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Western blots of whole-cell extracts from 2-week-old transgenic seedlings
of ML1::2xGFP and
ML1::NLS:2xGFP (A), ML1::AP1:GFP and
ML1::GFP:AP1 (B), and ML1::GLFY, ML1:LFY:GFP and
ML1::GFP:LFY (C) probed with anti-GFP antibody. Extract of wild-type
Col-0 seedlings was used as a negative control in A. Blots were deliberately
overexposed to reveal the presence of any minor bands. No major degradation
products in the form of single GFP were found. Bands detected at higher
molecular weight in the 2xGFP and GLFY lanes probably represent dimers
formed during the extraction procedure. In B, GFP:AP1 bands are marked with an
arrow and the minor single GFP band in GFP:AP1 is marked with an
arrowhead.
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Absence of movement of a functional AP1:GFP fusion. The C-terminal AP1:GFP
fusion can rescue ap1-15 mutant flowers to near wild type when
expressed from the AP1 promoter (A), and leads to the development of
bracts subtending flowers when expressed in the L1 of wild type (C). The
N-terminal fusion GFP:AP1 does not rescue ap1-15 mutant flowers when
expressed from the AP1 promoter (B). Confocal images of GFP
fluorescence in inflorescence apices of 2-week-old ML1::AP1:GFP (D,E)
and ML1::GFP:AP1 (F) plants are shown. AP1:GFP does not move from the
L1 (D; optical section through the shoot apex), and is tightly associated with
nuclei (E; tangential section through the L1 of a floral primordium). By
contrast, GFP:AP1 is largely cytoplasmic and moves into deeper tissues layers
from the L1 (F).
|
|

View larger version (153K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Movement of LFY-GFP fusions. Confocal images of GFP fluorescence in
inflorescence apices (A,B,D) and leaf epidermis (C) of 2-week-old
ML1::GLFY (A,C), ML1::GFP:LFY (B) and ML1::LFY:GFP
(D) transgenic plants. GLFY moves several cell layers into the underlying
tissue from the L1 in the apex (A). GFP:LFY shows a similar gradient from the
L1 as GLFY (B). The signal from LFY:GFP, which has the longest moving range,
appears `fuzzy' because of its higher cytoplasmic localization (D). All three
fusions are localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm in leaf epidermal
cells, and bright spots are sometimes found along the cell wall with GLFY
(shown in C).
|
|

View larger version (118K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Restricted lateral protein movement in the Arabidopsis shoot apex.
Confocal images of GFP fluorescence for inflorescence meristems with
surrounding young floral primordia from AG
intron*::NLS:2xGFP (A,D), AG
intron*::2xGFP (B,E) and AG
intron*::GLFY (C,F) plants. The confocal images have been
overlaid with images from the transmitted-light channel for orientation only.
Note that the confocal images are optical sections, which is not true for the
transmitted-light images. The mutated AG sequences in the reporters
activate expression in the shoot apical meristem and the center of young
flowers. Close-up views of stage 3 flowers reveal discrete lateral boundaries
of the GFP signal (D-F). No lateral movement is obvious in any of the three
cases.
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Rescue of lfy-12 mutant flowers by LFY and GLFY expression in the
center of the floral primordia. A wild-type Arabidopsis flower (A)
and a shoot-like structure that replaces a flower in lfy-12 mutants
(B) are shown. Both AG intron*::LFY and AG
intron*::GLFY can rescue the stamens and carpels of
lfy-12 mutant flowers (C,D), but only LFY rescues petals completely
(arrow in C).
|
|

View larger version (104K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Movement of mutant GLFY fusions from the L1. (A) Diagram of fusions of GFP
to weak alleles lfy-2 (P240L) and lfy-20 (N306D), and
intermediate alleles lfy-3 (T244M) and lfy-9 (R331K) in the
GLFY background. (B-E) Confocal images of GFP fluorescence in inflorescence
apices of 2-week-old plants. All fusion proteins can move from the L1 into
interior layers, although to different degrees.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003