spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 4, 2003
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00625


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erhardt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Surani, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erhardt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Surani, M. A.

Consequences of the depletion of zygotic and embryonic enhancer of zeste 2 during preimplantation mouse development

Sylvia Erhardt1,2, I-hsin Su3, Robert Schneider1, Sheila Barton1, Andrew J. Bannister1, Laura Perez-Burgos4, Thomas Jenuwein4, Tony Kouzarides1, Alexander Tarakhovsky3,* and M. Azim Surani1,{dagger}

1 Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
2 LBNL, MS 84-171, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
3 Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signaling, the Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA
4 IMP, Dr. Bohrgasse 7, A-1030 Vienna, Austria



View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Asymmetric localisation of Ezh2/EED and the effect of Ezh2 depletion. (A) Schematic representation of oocyte maturation and preimplantation development (see left panels). The second meiotic division commences at fertilisation and the two parental genomes remain separate as pronuclei until the first cleavage division. Development can also be initiated by activation of oocytes without fertilisation, followed by the suppression of second polar body extrusion by cytochalasin B to generate diploid parthenogenetic embryos. To deplete the oocytes of maternal Ezh2, transgenic mice with the Ezh2 conditional alleles, Ezh2F/F, were crossed with ZP3 Cre recombinase transgenic animals to delete the Ezh2F/F alleles specifically in the growing oocyte (see far right panel). Zp3 is expressed prior to the completion of the first meiotic division. Embryos depleted of maternal Ezh2 (right panels) were compared with those lacking both the maternal and embryonic Ezh2 (shown in the panel adjacent to the far-right panel). (B) Schematic depiction of development of zygotes at 0-3, 3-6 and 6-10 hours post fertilisation (hpf) (top line), with the corresponding immunostaining shown immediately below them. The haploid pronuclei inherited from the sperm and the oocyte can be distinguished morphologically (Hogan et al., 1994Go). Male and female pronuclei, and the second polar body (PB) are marked. All images in green show antibody staining, red shows DNA staining and yellow shows merged images. Ezh2 is first associated preferentially with the female pronucleus and the PB at 0-3 hpf. At ~3-6 hpf, Ezh2 can also be detected in the paternal pronucleus, and by 6-10 hpf, both male and female pronuclei show Ezh2 (white arrow heads). (C) Depicts a zygote depleted of maternally inherited Ezh2. Oocytes depleted of maternally inherited Ezh2 and fertilised by wild-type sperm show Ezh2 by immunostaining at the four-cell stage, indicating initiation of embryonic transcription of Ezh2. Note that the pronuclei in Ezh2 depleted zygotes appear to be slightly larger and less compact than in controls shown in 1B. (D) Eed is also asymmetrically localised to the female pronucleus (right panels). However, in Ezh2-depleted zygotes, asymmetric Eed localisation to the female pronucleus is highly reduced to virtually absent. Thus, asymmetrical localisation of Eed is apparently dependent on the maternal inheritance of Ezh2.

 


View larger version (66K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Ezh2 depletion disrupts histone H3 methylation in zygotes and early embryos. (A) Wild-type zygotes at 0-3 hpf show histone H3-me3-K27 methylation of the maternal pronucleus and of the PB. In the Ezh2-depleted zygote, H3-K27 methylation is markedly reduced (right panels). The H3-K9 shows a similar staining to H3-K27 but H3-K4 methylation is unchanged in Ezh2 depleted embryos (not shown). (B) A four-cell embryo with equal staining of all nuclei for H3-K27. In embryos depleted of maternally inherited Ezh2 (middle panel), the H3-27 is substantially less than in wild-type embryos (left panel). The H3-K27 levels are restored in these embryos at ~16- to 32-cell stage (far right panel). Bottom row, green shows antibody staining; middle row, DNA staining in red (propidium iodide); top row, merged images.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (A) Cryosection of a wild-type ovary. The ovary is stained with anti-Ezh2 (red; white arrow head) but not the surrounding somatic cells and follicle cells (orange arrowhead). (B) The effect of depletion of maternally inherited Ezh2 results in growth retardation even though Ezh2 transcription is restored at about the four-cell stage from the paternal allele (Fig. 1C), followed by a delayed restoration of normal H3-K27 by the 16-cell stage (Fig. 2B). The graph shows the average wet weight in grams of pups from Ezh2-depleted oocytes (blue bars) compared with pups with normal Ezh2 levels (red bars). (C) A summary of phenotypes with different mutations of Ezh2. Normal maternal inheritance of Ezh2 and one normal Ezh2 allele is necessary for normal development [based on O'Carroll et al. (O'Carroll et al., 2001Go) and this study]. Mice from a conventional knockout approach die early during embryogenesis, despite maternal supply of Ezh2, indicating that the embryonic Ezh2 transcript is essential for development. Mice without maternal Ezh2 supply but embryonic transcription are viable and fertile, but display a severe growth retardation until about the weaning age of 4 weeks.

 


View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Ezh2 and Eed co-localise at the Xi at the blastocyst stage. (A) Ezh2 distribution at the blastocyst stage of controls (fertilised or PG+/+). In about 50% of blastocysts from fertilised oocytes, Ezh2 protein (green) is detected as a spot within the nucleus of TE cells (white arrowhead). The inset shows a higher magnification of a TE cell in a PG+/+ blastocyst. The accumulation of Ezh2-Eed co-localises with a DNA dense region, presumably the inactivated X chromosome. As expected, PG-/- blastocysts do not show Ezh2 staining above background (not shown). (B) Eed distribution in PG+/+ blastocysts, which is similar to the staining for Ezh2 shown in A. The inset shows that Eed stays associated with one chromosome (DNA in red) during M-phase at the blastocyst stage, presumably the inactive X chromosome. (C) Eed staining in PG-/- blastocysts shows none of the localisation of Eed seen in PG+/+ blastocysts shown in B. (D) Ezh2 (red) and Eed (green) co-localise in trophectoderm cells at the blastocyst stage, presumably at the inactivated X chromosome. The image shows immunostaining of two TE cells from PG+/+ blastocysts. (E) Eed co-localises with macro-H2A in trophectoderm cells at the blastocyst stage in PG+/+ blastocysts. Macro-H2A is highly enriched on the Xi (Costanzi and Pehrson, 1998Go), indicating that Ezh2 and Eed are also associated with the Xi.

 


View larger version (85K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Histone methylation patterns are disturbed in the absence of Ezh2. (A) Histone H3-me3-K9 modification is present mainly in pericentric heterochromatic regions and can be detected as several foci in all cells of controls (left). The number and intensity of these foci is highly reduced in most cells of PG-/- embryos (far-right). (B) Histone H3-me2-K27 accumulates to one region in cells of the TE and has a stronger overall staining in cells of the presumptive ICM (left). By contrast, this accumulation is not detectable in PG-/- embryos (far right). (C) Histone H3-me3-K27 also accumulates in TE cells of control embryos, which is abolished in PG-/- blastocysts (not shown). Eed accumulation (in green) co-localises with H3-me3-K27 (in red) in TE cells of controls, presumably at the Xi, whereas cells of the ICM show a bright staining throughout the nucleus. DNA is counterstained with Toto3 (blue). The insets show a TE cell at a higher magnification with a clear co-localisation of Eed and H3-me3-K27. (D) Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) using a mouse X chromosome specific paint (red) combined with immunofluorescence shows that H3-me3-K27 (green) is associated with one X chromosome in a TE cell at the blastocyst stage. DNA is counterstained with Toto3 (blue). Metaphase chromosomes stained for H3-me3-K9 and H3-me1-K27 stained very brightly in control embryos and in PG-/-, owing to a higher accessibility of antibodies to metaphase chromosomes in early embryos. (E) Eed (green) accumulation at the Xi does not co-localise with H3-me3-K9 (red) in TE cells of controls. (F) Metaphase chromosomes in control embryos stain brightly for H3-me3-K9 in the pericentric heterochromatin (left, yellow staining). At later stages of development (9.5dpc), when Ezh2/Eed do not co-localise to the Xi any more (not shown), H3-me3-K9 specific antibodies stain one entire chromosome (white arrow head) in addition to pericentric heterochromatin in female embryos (middle). By contrast, me2- (and me3-) K27 is highly associated with one chromosome in control embryos at the blastocyst stage (right, white arrowheads), as well as in 50% of wild-type embryos at the blastocyst stage (not shown). D-F show TE cells in interphase (D,E) or metaphase (F) of normal fertilised embryos.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The ICM with pluripotent epiblast cells shows a specific and characteristic histone methylation pattern that is distinct from the pattern seen in TE cells. (A) The ICM with pluripotent epiblast cells has high me1-, me2- and me3-K27 methylation levels (pink, middle). These cells show expression of Oct4-GFP, which is a marker of pluripotent epiblast cells (green, right). This pattern of histone methylation differs from that in trophectoderm cells shown in Fig. 4. Cells that show clustering of di- and tri-K27 methylation on the Xi do not express Oct4-GFP (green), which is most obvious in single optical sections (right). The white arrowheads in the middle and right images indicate an Oct4-GFP-expressing cell in the ICM with high me3-K27 levels. The orange arrowhead indicates an Oct4-GFP negative cell that is undergoing X-inactivation. (B) The high levels of H3-K27 methylation of the ICM is similar to the staining at earlier stages of development, when all cells are pluripotent. The images show a late morula stage just prior to the blastocyst stage. (C) Deletion of Ezh2 from primary embryonic fibroblasts (PEFs) show no detectable effects on growth. Growth of PEFs was monitored in uninfected, GFP-infected and Cre-infected cells after three (1), five (2), six plus one passages (3) and eight days (4) in culture after infection. (F) Immunostaining of control GFP (upper panel) and experimental Cre (lower panel)-infected PEFS. The Ezh2 protein level was already highly reduced three days after Cre infection (lower panel) compared with GFP-infected cells (upper panel) as shown by immunofluorescence (DNA in blue, Ezh2 in red).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Immunoprecipitation (IP) with Ezh2 antibodies shows histone methyltransferase (HMTase) activity for K9 and K27. (A) HMTase activity was tested on two different types of peptides with various combinations of lysine methylation. (B) HMTase assay of Ezh2 IP from ES cell extract on peptides as substrate. The immunoprecipitate showed highest HMTase activity for K27-unmethylated peptides and a lower activity for peptides, which were unmethylated at K9 but fully methylated at K4. (C) Western blot analysis of IP-bound beads and supernatant (SN) showed that the Ezh2 antibodies precipitate Ezh2 and that Eed and HDAC1 are bound to this complex.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Summary of histone H3 methylation events and the role of Ezh2 at the onset of mouse development. Shortly after fertilisation, Ezh2/Eed and H3 methylation are predominantly associated with the female pronucleus, and establish an epigenetic asymmetry between the two parental genomes. When this asymmetry is disturbed after depletion of the maternally inherited Ezh2, there is a long-term effect resulting in severe growth retardation of neonates even when the embryonic transcription occurs at the four-cell stage. The epigenetic asymmetry therefore has a significant effect on development and fetal growth. During cleavage stages, Ezh2/Eed and H3 methylation levels are high. At this stage, all cells are pluripotent. During differentiation of TE cells, there are significant changes in the subnuclear localisation and levels of Ezh2/Eed and H3 histone methylation. The pluripotent epiblast cells that continue to express Oct4 retain a characteristic and a distinct histone methylation pattern consistent with the epigenetic plasticity of these cells.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003