spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 27 July 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.01957


Development 132, 3823-3833 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Major, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Major, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, K. D.

Influence of Notch on dorsoventral compartmentalization and actin organization in the Drosophila wing

Robert J. Major and Kenneth D. Irvine*

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Waksman Institute and Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA



View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Relationship between Notch activation and DV compartmentalization. (A) Signaling interactions at the DV boundary. Delta (Dl) is expressed by both dorsal and ventral cells in response to Notch activation (blue arrow), but signals most effectively (thick black arrow) to dorsal cells owing to the presence of Fng, and only signals poorly (thin arrow) to ventral cells. Activated Notch in dorsal cells acts together with the dorsal-specific gene ap (not shown) to promote expression of Ser. Ser is blocked (black T) from signaling (gray arrow) to other dorsal cells by Fng, and thus is limited to signaling back across the compartment boundary (thick black arrow) to ventral cells, where it activates Notch. As shown here, Notch activation also results in the elevation of F-actin (green lines) along the cell interface where peak signaling occurs; the resolution of confocal microscopy is such that this usually appears as a single line (see also Fig. 4). (B-D) Third instar wing imaginal discs, stained for ap-lacZ expression (red) to mark dorsal cells, and Wg (blue), to mark Notch activation. Expression of ap-lacZ is a reliable marker of dorsal provenance, as it is not affected by Notch signaling or changes in cell location (Blair et al., 1994Go; Micchelli and Blair, 1999Go; Rauskolb et al., 1999Go). In this and subsequent figures, discs are oriented with ventral down and anterior to the left. (B'-D''') Individual stains of the discs shown in B-D. (B) AyGal4 UAS-fng, with a clone of Fng-expressing cells (arrow) marked by co-expression of GFP (green). Ectopic expression of Fng can effectively reposition the compartment boundary away from the normal DV interface by simultaneously creating an ectopic stripe of Notch activation within ventral cells, and eliminating normal Notch activation at the DV interface (Rauskolb et al., 1999Go). The normal DV interface (arrowhead) is relatively straight and smooth, and is disturbed by the Fng-expressing clone. (C,D) AyGal4 UAS-Dl, with clones of Dl-expressing cells (arrows) marked by co-expression of GFP (green). Ectopic expression of Dl can effectively reposition the compartment boundary away from the normal DV interface by simultaneously creating an ectopic stripe of Notch activation within dorsal cells, and eliminating normal Notch activation at the DV interface. In C, the clone edge is smoother apically, as evidenced by Wg expression, than basally, as evidenced by GFP expression. In D, the ectopic Notch activation stripes are smooth, but do not completely register with the wild-type DV boundary.

 


View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Differential sensitivity of compartmentalization and Wg expression to Notch. (A-C) Nts wing imaginal discs, from animals cultured at 18°C during embryonic development, and then at (A) 18°C, (B) 22°C or (C) 29°C during larval development. At 22°C, in some instances (B, arrow), the DV interface is obviously disturbed despite continuous Wg expression. At 18°C, the DV interface is normal or subtly disturbed, and Wg expression is normal, whereas, at 29°C, the DV interface is grossly disturbed, and Wg is not expressed.

 


View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Spindle orientations in the wing. (A) Third instar wing imaginal disc, stained for {alpha}-tubulin (green), ap-lacZ (red), and DNA (blue). Arrows indicate examples of dividing cells at the DV boundary, bars mark their axis of division. This can occur at different orientations relative to the DV boundary. (B) Histogram showing the percent of spindles at the DV boundary (blue bars, out of 86 total) or away from the DV boundary (red bars, out of 456 total) found in different orientations relative to the boundary. The angle was defined by the axis of the spindle and the tangent of the nearest DV interface. Angles were binned into 15° increments, thus a random distribution would predict 16.7% of spindle orientations (one sixth of the total) in each bin (dashed line). There is a slight bias for cells at the boundary to divide parallel to it, but not enough to account for compartmentalization.

 


View larger version (132K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Actin and cell morphology at compartment boundaries. Wild-type mid-third instar wing discs, stained with phalloidin to reveal F-actin (green). To enable visualization across the curved surface of the disc in a single panel, the stains shown are projections through different focal planes. White arrows indicate the DV boundary. (A) Disc with elevated apical F-actin staining at the DV boundary clearly visible. A nuclear marker for dorsal cells (ap-lacZ, red) is not visible in apical focal planes, but is visible in more basal focal planes (A'). F-actin staining, however, is neither elevated nor smooth in basal-lateral sections (A',A''). (B-E) Close up of a portion of the DV border, stained for F-actin and E-cadherin (B), F-actin and ß-catenin (C), F-actin and anti-phospho-tyrosine (D), and Enabled and E-cadherin (E). (F) Vertical section through a disc stained for F-actin (green), E-cadherin (red) and ap-lacZ (blue). Arrow indicates F-actin at the DV boundary, which overlaps with E-cadherin.

 


View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Time course of F-actin organization. White arrows indicate F-actin at the DV boundary, yellow arrows point to F-actin at the AP boundary. (A-E) Discs of different ages stained for F-actin, an anterior marker (ci-lacZ, blue) and a dorsal marker (Bx, red). The apical DV F-actin line coincides precisely with the DV boundary during early-mid third instar, but because Bx and nuclear ß-galactosidase are more basal, and cells are not perfectly vertical, the difference in focal planes gives a false impression in some cases of discordance between them. Larvae were staged from the beginning of the L2-L3 molt, and are shown at (A) 0-12 hours, (B) 12-24 hours, (C) 24-36 hours, (D) 36-48 hours and (E,F) 48-60 hours of third instar. The DV F-actin line is consistently observed from 0-24 hours of third instar (A,B). From 24-36 hours, F-actin is not consistently elevated, but cells still generally line up along the DV boundary (C). From 36-48 hours the DV boundary is no longer distinguishable by F-actin staining, but F-actin begins to appear elevated in flanking cells (D); this is even more obvious in older discs (E,F), and appears adjacent to late stripes of Dl expression (magenta, F).

 


View larger version (66K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Notch regulates F-actin organization in the wing. (A-E') Third instar discs, stained for F-actin (green, shown from apical focal planes) and GFP (blue, marks Gal4-expressing cells), together with ap-lacZ (red, shown from basal focal planes) or Wg (red). (A) UAS-fng UAS-GFP ptc-Gal4. Normal Notch activation is observed at the DV boundary (arrowheads) and is disrupted near the AP boundary by ectopic Fng (asterisk), whereas ectopic Notch activation is induced along the AP boundary in ventral cells (arrow); corresponding changes occur in F-actin organization. In B-E arrowheads mark the normal DV F-actin line, arrows mark F-actin at clone edges. (B,C) A UAS-Dl UAS-GFP AyGal4 disc, with clones of cells expressing Delta. (D) A UAS-N-intra UAS-GFP AyGal4 disc, with clones of cells expressing N-intra. No autonomous influence on F-actin is observed, occasionally some upregulation is observed at clone edges, consistent with the ability of N-intra to induce Notch ligand expression. (E) Disc with a fat8 mutant clone, marked by the absence of GFP (blue). No influence on F-actin is observed.

 


View larger version (109K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Influence of capt on DV compartmentalization. Third instar wing imaginal discs, stained for Bx (red) and either Wg (blue) or En (magenta). Discs are shown two days after the induction of clones (marked by GFP expression, green) mutant for captE636 and expressing p35. In A,B, arrows indicate disturbances in the DV boundary associated with mutant clones; in C, arrow points to a clone that is adjacent to the AP boundary but does not distort it.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005