|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 4 October 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02602
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Biology, CB #3280, Coker Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
jreed{at}email.unc.edu)
Accepted 30 August 2006
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Auxin response factor, microRNA, Ovule, Anther, Arabidopsis
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arabidopsis ovules initiate as finger-like structures on the
flanks of carpel margin meristems at around floral stage 8
(Smyth et al., 1990
).
Megaspore mother cells, which later give rise to the female gametophyte,
reside in the distal nucellus end of ovules. Proximal to the nucellus is the
chalaza, where both inner and outer integuments initiate. Inner and outer
integuments grow out to enclose the entire ovule as the ovule matures, and
asymmetric growth of the outer integument causes the developing ovule to
curve. After fertilization and embryo development, integuments form the seed
coat. Ovules are connected to the placental tissues by funiculi, which supply
nutrients to support ovule and seed growth
(Schneitz et al., 1997
;
Skinner et al., 2004
).
Stamen primordia initiate at floral stage 6 and form a filament that holds
an anther at its distal end. Several distinct cell types in anthers are
important for male gametogenesis and anther dehiscence
(Goldberg et al., 1993
;
Smyth et al., 1990
). Some of
these undergo cell death or desiccation to allow dispersal of pollen grains at
anthesis. Prior to anthesis, tapetum cells that coat the anther locule wall
and septum cells between two anther locules are degraded. Stomium cells then
break to allow pollen dispersal (Sanders
et al., 1999
).
Endogenous small non-coding RNAs called microRNAs (miRNAs) regulate several
developmental events in Arabidopsis
(Baker et al., 2005
;
Bao et al., 2004
;
Chen, 2004
;
Emery et al., 2003
;
Laufs et al., 2004
;
Mallory et al., 2004a
;
Williams et al., 2005
). miRNA
precursor genes (MIRs) are transcribed by RNA polymerase II in both
animals and plants (Kurihara and Watanabe,
2004
; Lee et al.,
2004
; Xie et al.,
2005
). DICER-LIKE 1 (DCL1), an Arabidopsis DICER RNase
III family homolog, cleaves the pri-miRNA and premiRNA hairpin precursors to
produce a miRNA:miRNA* duplex in the nucleus
(Jones-Rhoades et al., 2006
).
The duplex is transported to the cytoplasm where the mature miRNA is
incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The RISC complex
then identifies target mRNAs with specificity provided by base pairing between
the miRNA and the target site (Bartel,
2004
).
Most plant miRNAs have high sequence complementarity to their target
binding sites, allowing a straightforward prediction of the genes they
regulate (Rhoades et al.,
2002
). In most cases, plant miRNAs shut down their target gene
activities by transcript cleavage (Axtell
and Bartel, 2005
; Schwab et
al., 2005
). Overexpressing MIR precursor transcripts in
transgenic plants decreased the corresponding target gene transcript levels
(Schwab et al., 2005
). In
addition, cleavage products of computationally predicted miRNA targets have
been detected in wild-type plants (Allen et
al., 2005
; Kasschau et al.,
2003
; Mallory et al.,
2005
; Xie et al.,
2005
). Nevertheless, miRNAs can act by other regulatory
mechanisms, including translational inhibition and methylation-induced gene
silencing (Bao et al., 2004
;
Bartel, 2004
;
Chen, 2004
;
Kurihara and Watanabe,
2004
).
More than half of the known Arabidopsis miRNA target genes encode
transcription factors, suggesting that miRNAs regulate various developmental
processes (Jones-Rhoades et al.,
2006
). The importance of plant miRNAs is further supported by the
finding that most Arabidopsis miRNA families are conserved among
other species of land plants, both vascular and, in some cases, lower plants
(Axtell and Bartel, 2005
;
Floyd and Bowman, 2004
;
Reinhart et al., 2002
;
Rhoades et al., 2002
;
Sunkar et al., 2005
).
Among miRNA targets are several ARF genes encoding Auxin Response
Factors. ARF6 and ARF8 are targeted by miR167,
whereas ARF10, ARF16 and ARF17 are targeted by
miR160 (Mallory et al.,
2005
; Rhoades et al.,
2002
; Wang et al.,
2005
). ARF proteins bind to auxin response promoter elements and
mediate gene expression responses to the plant hormone auxin
(Hagen and Guilfoyle, 2002
;
Liscum and Reed, 2002
;
Mallory et al., 2005
;
Tiwari et al., 2003
).
Different ARF proteins regulate embryogenesis, root development and floral
organ formation (Hardtke and Berleth,
1998
; Hardtke et al.,
2004
; Mallory et al.,
2005
; Sessions et al.,
1997
; Wang et al.,
2005
).
We previously found that ARF6 and ARF8 regulate flower
maturation (Nagpal et al.,
2005
). Flowers of arf6 arf8 double loss-of-function
mutant plants were arrested at stage 12, just before wild-type flower buds
normally open. Stamens of arf6 arf8 flowers were short, and anthers
did not dehisce to release pollen. The double mutant anther indehiscence was
due to a lack of jasmonic acid (JA) production, and pollen release could be
restored by spraying the flower buds with JA or its precursors. arf6
arf8 double mutant flowers were also female sterile and their stigmatic
papillae did not elongate as did those of wild-type flowers. Single
loss-of-function arf6 or arf8 mutants had only subtly
reduced fecundity, resulting from shorter stamen filaments and delayed anther
dehiscence, indicating that ARF6 and ARF8 act largely redundantly.
To determine the developmental functions of miR167, we have overexpressed MIR167-coding sequences, mutated ARF6 and ARF8 to make them immune to miR167-mediated effects, and studied the expression of MIR167, ARF6 and ARF8 genes. Our results indicate that miR167 regulates the pattern of ARF6 and ARF8 expression, which is vital for both ovule and anther development.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MIR167a (At3g22886; stem-loop sequence accession number, MI0000208), MIR167b (At3g63375; stem-loop accession number, MI0000209), MIR167c (stem-loop accession number, MI0001088) and MIR167d (stem-loop accession number, MI0000975) were PCR amplified from wild-type genomic DNA using the following primers:
MIR167a, 5'-CACCCACTTTCGACCCTTAAACTCTCCA-3' and 5'-TGAAGCTAGGAAAGAGGAGCTTTG-3';
MIR167b, 5'-CACCTCAGGCTTCTTTAATTCGTGGTG-3' and 5'-AACTTAGACTGTGCAAAGCCAAA-3';
MIR167c, 5'-CACCCCATGGGTGAGAAAGTGAAAA-3' and 5'-TCATGATTGTCACACTAGCACAA-3'; and
MIR167d, 5'-CACCTGAATGAAACTGTCCAAACACA-3' and 5'-CGTCGCTAGCTACCAACAAA-3'.
PCR products were cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen) and then subcloned
into binary vector pB7WG2 (Karimi et al.,
2002
) by LR clonase (Invitrogen).
A genomic ARF6 (gARF6) fragment including the 5'
and 3' regulatory sequences (chromosome 1 positions 10693520-10680841)
was cut out from BAC clone T4K22 with BamHI and subcloned into pBS
SK- (Stratagene) (Nagpal et
al., 2005
). The miR167 target site on ARF6 was
mutated by PCR using primers:
5'-GACCCTGTGCGTAGTGGATGGCAGCTGGTATTTG-3' and
5'-CAAATACCAGCTGCCATCCACTACGCACAGGGTC-3'. Both gARF6 and
the mutated ARF6 (mARF6) were cloned into binary vector pBAR
(Holt et al., 2002
). Genomic
ARF8 (gARF8) was obtained from BAC clone K15O15 by PCR
(chromosome 5 position 14645242-14652007) in three fragments using the
following primer pairs, and then ligated together:
5'-CTCGAGTGAGAACTGAGGCTGGCTTT-3' and
5'-GTCTAATTCAACTTCAAGAA-3';
5'-TCTTCCTTCTCTCCACTGTATCG-3' and
5'-GACCCTCTTCAGAGCTCTACTCA-3'; and
5'-CACCATCGATCATGCTGGCACATCATCTTT-3' and
5'-CTCGAGCTAGGCACTGTTTATG-3'. mARF8 was obtained by
mutating the miR167 target site by the same method as for
mARF6. Both gARF8 and mARF8 were first cloned into
pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen) and then into binary vector pKWG
(Karimi et al., 2002
) by LR
clonase (Invitrogen).
gARF6, mARF6, gARF8 and mARF8 fragments, excluding their stop codons and 3' untranslated regions, were cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen) and then introduced into pGWB3 (a kind gift from Dr Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, Shimane University, Japan) by LR clonase (Invitrogen) to obtain the protein GUS fusions.
PMIR167a, PMIR167b, PMIR167c and PMIR167d were PCR amplified from wild-type genomic DNA using the following primers:
PMIR167a, 5'-CACCAAGTTTCGAGTAGACCGTGA-3' and 5'-TCAGATGCCGGTGCACCATA-3';
PMIR167b, 5'-CACCAGGGTAGAGGGTTTCTCAAG-3' and 5'-TTGTGGACTTGTCTTCAAAA-3';
PMIR167c, 5'-CACCCGTTGTGTGGTGTTTCCAAC-3' and 5'-TACATGGTATACATACAGACATGA-3'; and
PMIR167d, 5'-CACCTCACGTTTCTATGGACCCAAT-3' and 5'-TAGATAATTGAAAAAGAATGAGAAG-3'.
These promoters were cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen) and subcloned
into binary vector pBGWFS7 (Karimi et al.,
2002
) to produce PMIR167:GFP-GUS constructs.
Only GUS activity was assayed in plants carrying these constructs.
Northern blots and in situ hybridization
Total cellular RNA was isolated from flower clusters of long-day-grown
plants by Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA gel blot analysis was performed as
previously described (Tian et al.,
2003
). ARF6 (coding region position 1346-2211) and
ARF8 (coding region position 1151-2106) probes were amplified from
cDNA with the following primers: ARF6,
5'-CGGAATTCAGGCATTGATCCTGCAAAAG-3' and
5'-CGGGATCCAAGGTTTGACATTCCGTTCG-3'; and ARF8,
5'-CGGGATCCGAAGGGGTGATTTGGGAAGT-3' and
5'-CTCGAGGTTGGACGAGTTAATCTGTCC-3'. A probe recognizing
Arabidopsis ß-tubulin 4 (At5g44340) was used as a loading
control in RNA gel blot hybridizations.
For low molecular weight RNA, 30 µg of total cellular RNA was suspended
in 20 µl loading buffer (95% formamide, 5 mM EDTA, 0.025% SDS, 0.025%
bromophenol blue and 0.025% xylene cyanol FF) and separated in 15% denaturing
polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea. Antisense miR167
(5'-TAGATCATGCTGGCAGCTTCA-3') and U6 snRNA probes
(5'-CTCGATTTATGCGTGTCATCCTTGC-3') were end labeled by T4
polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) in the presence of
32P-ATP.
In situ hybridization was performed as previously described
(Long and Barton, 1998
).
ARF6 and ARF8 fragments used in northern blots were cloned
into plasmid pGEM-T (Promega). Probes were labeled by in vitro transcription
with SP6 polymerase using a DIG RNA labeling kit (Roche). Wild-type and
mARF6 hybridizations were done together, so as to increase
comparability of results. INNER NO OUTER probe was amplified from
wild-type flower cDNA using primers described by Sieber et al.
(Sieber et al., 2004
) and
cloned into pGEM-T (Promega).
Histology and microscopy
Flower X-gluc staining was performed as described by Sessions et al.
(Sessions et al., 1999
), and
the concentration of potassium ferrocyanide and ferricyanide used depended on
the constructs. For MIR167 promoter:GFPGUS lines, the concentration
used was 5 mM each. For ARF6 and ARF8 protein:GUS fusions,
it was 0.5 mM each for ovules and 0.2 mM each for flowers.
For tracking pollen tube growth, stigmas were dusted with pollen from
LAT52:GUS plants (Johnson et al.,
2004
). Twenty-four hours after pollination, carpel walls were
removed and gynoecia were stained with X-gluc overnight at 37°C.
Ovules for DIC microscopy were fixed in 3:1 ethanol:acetic acid for 15
minutes, incubated in 70% ethanol for another 15 minutes, cleared in
chlorohydate solution (chlorohydrate:water, 8:2), and observed under DIC
microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy was performed as previously described
(Nagpal et al., 2005
). Anthers
were fixed and sectioned based on methods described by Ellis et al.
(Ellis et al., 2005
).
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In wild-type flowers, ARF6 transcript was present in the carpel medial ridge (which later forms the transmitting tract for pollen tube growth), in placental tissues, and in young ovule primordia as they emerged (Fig. 1B,D). As integuments initiated on the flanks of ovules (ovule stage 2-II), ARF6 transcript became restricted to the ovule funiculus and the placental tissues, and was excluded from the integuments and the nucellus (Fig. 1E,F). These expression patterns persisted at least through flower stage 12, just before fertilization would normally occur. ARF6 transcript was also detected at a low level in the vasculature of flower stems and stamen filaments, in petals, and in nectaries (Fig. 1A,C). Consistent with the in situ hybridization data, gARF6:GUS expression was detected in the transmitting tract, the ovule funiculi and nectaries, and faintly in the stamen filaments (Fig. 2A-E).
ARF8 was expressed in a similar pattern to ARF6, with strong expression in the funiculus and placenta (Fig. 1J). ARF8 was also detected in stigmatic papillae in flowers approaching anthesis (data not shown). Similarly, gARF8:GUS was expressed in the transmitting tract, placenta, funiculi and stamen filaments (Fig. 2K,M). Stigmatic papillae expression was also detected in some strongly expressing gARF8:GUS lines (data not shown). In addition, we detected weak X-gluc staining in the style and in the valves of both gARF6:GUS and gARF8:GUS plants, but we did not detect ARF6 or ARF8 transcripts in these tissues by in situ hybridization.
Expression of ARF6 and ARF8 in style, transmitting tract
and funiculus suggests that ARF6 and ARF8 may regulate fertilization rather
than gametophyte development. To explore why arf6 arf8 flowers were
female sterile, we pollinated wild-type and arf6 arf8 stigmas with
pollen from the LAT52:GUS reporter line
(Johnson et al., 2004
).
Whereas pollen grew efficiently in wild-type transmitting tracts and
fertilized the majority of ovules, pollen tubes elongated very little in
arf6 arf8 transmitting tracts
(Fig. 4M). These results
indicate that ARF6 and ARF8 may act within the stigma, style or transmitting
tract to regulate the production of some component necessary for pollen tube
germination or growth.
MIR167 genes can decrease ARF6 and ARF8 transcript levels
ARF6 and ARF8 mRNA cleavage products ending within the
miR167 target site have been detected in wild-type plants
(Allen et al., 2005
;
Jones-Rhoades and Bartel,
2004
; Rhoades et al.,
2002
). To test whether miR167 targets only these two
genes, we made transgenic plants expressing the stem-loop regions of each of
the four predicted Arabidopsis MIR167 precursor genes behind the
strong Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S promoter
(P35S::MIR167a, b, c and d). Only
P35S::MIR167a caused twisted leaves, short inflorescences
and arrested flower development, thereby fully recapitulating arf6
arf8 mature plant phenotypes (Fig.
3B,C and Table 1).
We did not examine seedling or root phenotypes in these sterile plants.
P35S::MIR167b and P35S::MIR167c caused
weaker mutant phenotypes, whereas P35S::MIR167d plants all
appeared identical to wild-type plants
(Fig. 3B,C and
Table 1). The phenotypic
strengths of plants expressing different MIR167 precursor genes
correlated with the amount of mature miR167 produced, and with the
degree of reduction of ARF6 and ARF8 transcript levels
(Fig. 3D). These results
confirm that miR167 can remove or destabilize ARF6 and
ARF8 transcripts in vivo. No additional leaf or flower phenotype was
observed in transgenic plants carrying any of the four constructs, suggesting
that miR167 targets only ARF6 and ARF8 in adult
leaves, inflorescences and flowers.
|
|
The severity of phenotypes of mARF6 plants correlated with the level of mARF6 transcript being expressed (Fig. 4A). mARF6-I transgenic plants with the highest ARF6 levels (12 out of 63 T1 plants) had small leaves and sterile flowers (Fig. 4A,B; see also Fig. S2 in the supplementary material). mARF6-II plants, with ARF6 levels higher than wild-type plants but lower than mARF-I plants (36/63), had slightly smaller leaves than wild-type plants and sterile flowers (Fig. 4A,B; Fig. S2 in the supplementary material). mARF6-III plants (15/63), with similar ARF6 levels to wild-type plants, had leaves similar in size to those of mARF6-II or wild-type plants, but did produce seeds (Fig. 4A,B; Fig. S2 in the supplementary material). However, mARF6-III seeds were small and could not germinate. As described below, embryos in these seeds were arrested.
|
miR167 regulates ovule development
Female sterility in mARF6 plants arose from defects in ovule
development. Early stage 2-IV ovules from mARF6-II plants had
indistinguishable morphology from wild-type ovules, with inner and outer
integuments initiated properly on ovule flanks
(Fig. 4C,G). However, whereas
wild-type outer integuments grew to encase the entire nucellus
(Fig. 4D,E), mARF6-II
outer integuments only grew slightly (Fig.
4H,I). In mARF6-I ovules, both inner and outer
integuments and the nucellus were developmentally arrested
(Fig. 4K). In
mARF6-III ovules, outer integuments extended farther than in
mARF6-II ovules, but they nevertheless failed to envelop the nucellus
completely (Fig. 4L). In
contrast to these effects on integument growth, cell morphology and
arrangement in funiculi of mARF6 ovules appeared normal
(Fig. 4E,I).
These ovule integument defects affected both pollen tube guidance to the
ovule and embryo development. Wild-type pollen tubes grew normally in
transmitting tracts of mARF6-II gynoecia
(Fig. 4M). However, only a
small proportion of mARF6 ovules (12%, n=195) were
fertilized by wild-type pollen (Fig.
4F,J), whereas 84% (n=70) of gARF6 ovules were
fertilized. Moreover, fertilized mARF6 ovules still failed to support
embryo development. Seven days after pollination, gARF6 embryos had
developed to mid-torpedo stage (Fig.
4N), whereas embryos on mARF6 plants were developmentally
arrested at the four-cell stage (Fig.
4O). Embryos formed in self-fertilized mARF6-III flowers
also developed only to the four-cell stage. Similarly, absence of the outer
integument in the inner no outer-1 (ino-1) mutant, which is
deficient in a member of the YABBY gene family
(Villanueva et al., 1999
),
caused reduced fertilization efficiency and arrested embryo development (data
not shown). Thus, a primary defect in integument growth accounts for female
sterility.
To determine whether altered distribution of ARF6 and ARF8 transcripts could account for these phenotypes, we examined ARF6 and ARF8 expression patterns in flowers of mARF6-II and mARF8-II plants by in situ hybridization (Fig. 1). As a second method, we also compared X-gluc staining patterns in plants carrying miR167-insensitive translational GUS fusions (mARF6:GUS, mARF8:GUS) with the staining patterns of the gARF6:GUS and gARF8:GUS plants described above (Fig. 2). In some strongly staining mARF8:GUS lines, a subset of ovules had reduced outer integument growth similar to mARF6-III ovules (Fig. 2N), suggesting that these constructs were partially functional. However, most mARF6:GUS and mARF8:GUS plants had fertile flowers, and these reporter constructs thereby revealed expression patterns largely independently of effects of the mARF6 or mARF8 mutations on ovule or anther development.
Consistent with northern blot results, ARF6 expression in mARF6-II ovules appeared stronger in tissues where ARF6 was expressed in wild-type ovules (Fig. 1E-F,H-I, Fig. 2C-E,H-J). Moreover, mARF6 (Fig. 1H,I) and mARF6:GUS (Fig. 2H-J) expression also appeared in the integuments and nucellus. In stage 4-I ovules, staining of mARF6:GUS persisted most strongly in the chalazal domain of the mature ovule, but decreased in the tips of the integuments (Fig. 2J). In mARF8 ovules, the expression of ARF8 expanded only into the integuments and not into the nucellus (Fig. 1K), suggesting that the expanded expression of ARF8 into the integument region might be sufficient to arrest outer integument growth. Similarly, mARF8:GUS was expressed in both funiculi and ovules (Fig. 2L,N).
|
MIR167a is expressed in ovules and anthers
The mARF6 and mARF8 expression data indicated that
miR167 limits ARF6 and ARF8 transcript expression
domains in ovules. To determine MIR167 expression domains, we made
transgenic plants carrying approximately 2 kb promoter fragments upstream of
the stem-loop sequences of MIR167a, b, c and d fused to a
GFP-GUS reporter gene (PMIR167a,b,c,d::GUS), and
analyzed promoter activities by X-gluc staining. In ovules,
PMIR167a::GUS expression
(Fig. 2P-R), and to a lesser
degree PMIR167b::GUS and PMIR167c::GUS
expression (Fig. 2V,X),
correlated with miR167 functions revealed by mutating target sites.
PMIR167a::GUS expression first appeared at late ovule
stage 1, in the cells from which both the inner and outer integuments would
later be initiated (Fig. 2P).
As both integuments enveloped the nucellus and the ovule began to grow
asymmetrically, staining expanded into the entire nucellus and integuments,
but was always absent from the funiculus
(Fig. 2Q,R).
PMIR167a::GUS also stained in anthers and in sepal
vasculature (Fig. 2O).
PMIR167b::GUS was expressed in the ovules and nectaries,
but was not detected in other floral organs in the open flower
(Fig. 2U), and staining in
mature PMIR167b::GUS ovules was restricted mostly to the
tips of inner and outer integuments (Fig.
2V). PMIR167c::GUS stained mainly in the
stamen filaments with a trace amount of staining in the ovules
(Fig. 2W,X), and
PMIR167d::GUS stained only in sepals and petals, but not
in the internal floral organs (Fig.
2Y). In situ hybridization results have also shown that, in both
Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis, miR167 is present in
ovules and in anther vasculature, but not in funiculi
(Valoczi et al., 2006
).
miR167 regulates anther development
Male sterility of mARF6 and mARF8 flowers was due to
indehiscent anthers (Fig. 4B).
Anthers of mARF6 and mARF8 flowers appeared normal before
stage 10. However, mARF6-II anthers grew to be 20% larger than
wild-type anthers as a result of enlarged connective cells, without any
significant increase in cell number (Fig.
5A,D). By contrast, the vascular bundles of mARF6-II
anthers were smaller than those of wild-type anthers
(Fig. 5B,E). In the oldest
closed wild-type flower bud, anther tapetum and septum had entirely degraded,
and as flowers opened stomium cells broke apart to allow the release of pollen
grains (Fig. 5A). In
mARF6-II anthers, traces of tapetum were present within the anther
locules of the oldest closed flower bud, and the septum did not degrade so
that the two anther locules did not fuse. Septum cell breakage occurred in
mARF6-II anthers after flower opening, but the stomium still remained
intact, resulting in a lack of anther dehiscence
(Fig. 5D). Unlike the arf6
arf8 double mutant, spraying with JA did not restore mARF6
anther dehiscence.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the four predicted MIR167 genes, when overexpressed only MIR167a caused high miR167 production and arrested flower development to the same extent as in arf6 arf8 plants. DCL1 might recognize or process the stem-loop structure of MIR167a more efficiently than it does the others. In addition, miR167b and miR167c might have weaker activities toward ARF6 and ARF8 transcripts, and MIR167d may be a pseudogene that does not have activity. MIR167a is therefore most likely to be the main functional miR167 precursor gene in vivo. Consistent with this idea, PMIR167a::GUS expression in ovules correlated precisely with the miR167 functions revealed in mARF6 and mARF8 plants.
In ovules, the complementary ARF6, ARF8 and miR167
expression patterns, and the arrested development of mARF6 and
mARF8 integuments, indicate that miR167 functions to clear
ARF6 and ARF8 transcripts from cells that will become
integuments, thereby allowing integument growth. Persistence of the expression
patterns at later ovule stages suggests that miR167 both establishes
and maintains the correct pattern. ARF2, encoding another ARF
protein, is normally expressed in the integuments and nucellus, and inhibits
integument growth (Schruff et al.,
2006
). The ectopic ARF6 and ARF8 activity caused by blocking
miR167 function may therefore activate pathways that ARF2 normally
activates to restrict integument growth. Future studies may reveal the extent
to which different ARF proteins have different activities, and why different
ARF genes are expressed in mutually exclusive domains.
In anthers, miR167 was present in vascular cells where
mARF6 and mARF8 accumulated
(Valoczi et al., 2006
),
indicating that miR167 patterns gene expression in anthers as it does
in ovules. However, although anther vasculature was altered in mARF6
and mARF8 plants, the strongest anther phenotypes were in connective
cells, which grew abnormally large, and in locules, which failed to break open
to release pollen and, in some cases, ectopically expressed the
auxin-responsive marker DR5::GUS. mARF6 and mARF8 therefore
have non-cell-autonomous effects in anthers. Anther dehiscence requires a
series of desiccation events (Ishiguro et
al., 2001
), and excess ARF6 and ARF8 transcripts
in the vasculature might increase water uptake, leading to excess connective
cell expansion and preventing dehiscence.
Although miR167 accumulated in anther vasculature
(Valoczi et al., 2006
), we
detected PMIR167a::GUS expression in connective cells but
not in vasculature. This difference suggests that miR167 processing
or stability may differ in different cell types, or that miR167 may
move between cells.
Just as ectopic mARF6 and mARF8 appear to act cell
autonomously in ovules but non-cell autonomously in anthers, wild-type
ARF6 and ARF8 appear to act autonomously in gynoecium
transmitting tracts but non-automonously on anthers, by affecting JA
production from other tissues (Nagpal et
al., 2005
). Moreover, mARF6 and mARF8 restrict
growth in ovules, but cause extra growth in anthers. These observations
suggest that ARF6 and ARF8 may activate distinct target genes in ovules and
anthers.
In Drosophila, microRNAs have been suggested to function to
reinforce transcriptional repression patterns
(Stark et al., 2005
). By
contrast, the function of miR167 to restrict distribution of its
target transcripts is an essential patterning function that is not conferred
by transcriptional controls of ARF6 and ARF8 alone.
miR165/166 also affects development by excluding expression of its
target transcripts from the abaxial domain of lateral organs
(Juarez et al., 2004
;
Kidner and Martienssen, 2004
;
Mallory et al., 2004b
). In
fact, the miR165/166-insensitive phb-1d/+ mutant also has
arrested outer integuments (Sieber et al.,
2004
), suggesting that both miR165/166 and
miR167 might regulate common pathways during ovule formation.
miR167 is present in angiosperms and gymnosperms, but not in
mosses, lycopods or ferns (Axtell and
Bartel, 2005
). Angiosperms and gymnosperms are seed plants, and
form integuments around the female gametophyte that later form the seed coat.
Gymnosperm male gametophytes are also surrounded by sterile cells that are
similar to angiosperm anther connective cells
(Gifford and Foster, 1988
).
The appearance of miR167 in seed plants but not in lower plants
therefore suggests that regulation by miR167 could have arisen as
plants evolved the formation of sporophytic structures that protect
gametophytes.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/133/21/4211/DC1
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allen, E., Xie, Z., Gustafson, A. M. and Carrington, J. C. (2005). microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 121,207 -221.[CrossRef][Medline]
Axtell, M. J. and Bartel, D. P. (2005).
Antiquity of microRNAs and their targets in land plants. Plant
Cell 17,1658
-1673.
Baker, C. C., Sieber, P., Wellmer, F. and Meyerowitz, E. M. (2005). The early extra petals1 mutant uncovers a role for microRNA miR164c in regulating petal number in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 15,303 -315.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bao, N., Lye, K. W. and Barton, M. K. (2004). MicroRNA binding sites in Arabidopsis class III HD-ZIP mRNAs are required for methylation of the template chromosome. Dev. Cell 7, 653-662.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bartel, D. P. (2004). MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116,281 -297.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, X. (2004). A microRNA as a translational
repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development.
Science 303,2022
-2025.
Ellis, C. M., Nagpal, P., Young, J. C., Hagen, G., Guilfoyle, T.
J. and Reed, J. W. (2005). AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR1 and AUXIN
RESPONSE FACTOR2 regulate senescence and floral organ abscission in
Arabidopsis thaliana. Development
132,4563
-4574.
Emery, J. F., Floyd, S. K., Alvarez, J., Eshed, Y., Hawker, N. P., Izhaki, A., Baum, S. F. and Bowman, J. L. (2003). Radial patterning of Arabidopsis shoots by class III HD-ZIP and KANADI genes. Curr. Biol. 13,1768 -1774.[CrossRef][Medline]
Floyd, S. K. and Bowman, J. L. (2004). Gene regulation: ancient microRNA target sequences in plants. Nature 428,485 -486.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gifford, E. M. and Foster, A. S. (1988). Morphology and Evolution of Vascular Plants. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Goldberg, R. B., Beals, T. P. and Sanders, P. M.
(1993). Anther development: basic principles and practical
applications. Plant Cell
5,1217
-1229.
Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. (2002). Auxin-responsive gene expression: genes, promoters and regulatory factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 49,373 -385.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hardtke, C. S. and Berleth, T. (1998). The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J. 17,1405 -1411.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hardtke, C. S., Ckurshumova, W., Vidaurre, D. P., Singh, S. A.,
Stamatiou, G., Tiwari, S. B., Hagen, G., Guilfoyle, T. J. and Berleth, T.
(2004). Overlapping and non-redundant functions of the
Arabidopsis auxin response factors MONOPTEROS and NONPHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL 4.
Development 131,1089
-1100.
Holt, B. F., 3rd, Boyes, D. C., Ellerstrom, M., Siefers, N., Wiig, A., Kauffman, S., Grant, M. R. and Dangl, J. L. (2002). An evolutionarily conserved mediator of plant disease resistance gene function is required for normal Arabidopsis development. Dev. Cell 2,807 -817.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ishiguro, S., Kawai-Oda, A., Ueda, J., Nishida, I. and Okada,
K. (2001). The DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCENCE1 gene
encodes a novel phospholipase A1 catalyzing the initial step of jasmonic acid
biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and
flower opening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell
13,2191
-2209.
Johnson, M. A., von Besser, K., Zhou, Q., Smith, E., Aux, G.,
Patton, D., Levin, J. Z. and Preuss, D. (2004). Arabidopsis
hapless mutations define essential gametophytic functions.
Genetics 168,971
-982.
Jones-Rhoades, M. W. and Bartel, D. P. (2004). Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol. Cell 14,787 -799.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P. and Bartel, B. (2006). MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 19-53.[CrossRef][Medline]
Juarez, M. T., Kui, J. S., Thomas, J., Heller, B. A. and Timmermans, M. C. (2004). microRNA-mediated repression of rolled leaf1 specifies maize leaf polarity. Nature 428, 84-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Karimi, M., Inze, D. and Depicker, A. (2002). GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 7,193 -195.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kasschau, K. D., Xie, Z., Allen, E., Llave, C., Chapman, E. J., Krizan, K. A. and Carrington, J. C. (2003). P1/HC-Pro, a viral suppressor of RNA silencing, interferes with Arabidopsis development and miRNA unction. Dev. Cell 4, 205-217.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kidner, C. A. and Martienssen, R. A. (2004). Spatially restricted microRNA directs leaf polarity through ARGONAUTE1. Nature 428,81 -84.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kurihara, Y. and Watanabe, Y. (2004).
Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101,12753
-12758.
Laufs, P., Peaucelle, A., Morin, H. and Traas, J.
(2004). MicroRNA regulation of the CUC genes is required for
boundary size control in Arabidopsis meristems.
Development 131,4311
-4322.
Lee, Y., Kim, M., Han, J., Yeom, K. H., Lee, S., Baek, S. H. and Kim, V. N. (2004). MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 23,4051 -4060.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liscum, E. and Reed, J. W. (2002). Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 49,387 -400.[CrossRef][Medline]
Long, J. A. and Barton, M. K. (1998). The development of apical embryonic pattern in Arabidopsis. Development 125,3027 -3035.[Abstract]
Mallory, A. C., Dugas, D. V., Bartel, D. P. and Bartel, B. (2004a). MicroRNA regulation of NAC-domain targets is required for proper formation and separation of adjacent embryonic, vegetative, and floral organs. Curr. Biol. 14,1035 -1046.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mallory, A. C., Reinhart, B. J., Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Tang, G., Zamore, P. D., Barton, M. K. and Bartel, D. P. (2004b). MicroRNA control of PHABULOSA in leaf development: importance of pairing to the microRNA 5' region. EMBO J. 23,3356 -3364.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mallory, A. C., Bartel, D. P. and Bartel, B.
(2005). MicroRNA-directed regulation of Arabidopsis AUXIN
RESPONSE FACTOR17 is essential for proper development and modulates expression
of early auxin response genes. Plant Cell
17,1360
-1375.
Nagpal, P., Ellis, C. M., Weber, H., Ploense, S. E., Barkawi, L.
S., Guilfoyle, T. J., Hagen, G., Alonso, J. M., Cohen, J. D., Farmer, E. E. et
al. (2005). Auxin response factors ARF6 and ARF8 promote
jasmonic acid production and flower maturation.
Development 132,4107
-4118.
Reinhart, B. J., Weinstein, E. G., Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, B.
and Bartel, D. P. (2002). MicroRNAs in plants.
Genes Dev. 16,1616
-1626.
Rhoades, M. W., Reinhart, B. J., Lim, L. P., Burge, C. B., Bartel, B. and Bartel, D. P. (2002). Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 110,513 -520.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sanders, P. M., Bui, A. Q., Weterings, K., McIntire, K. N., Hsu, Y. C., Lee, P. Y., Truong, M. T., Beals, T. P. and Goldberg, R. B. (1999). Anther developmental defects in Arabidopsis thaliana male-sterile mutants. Sex Plant Reprod. 11,297 -322.[CrossRef]
Schneitz, K., Hulskamp, M., Kopczak, S. D. and Pruitt, R. E. (1997). Dissection of sexual organ ontogenesis: a genetic analysis of ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 124,1367 -1376.[Abstract]
Schruff, M. C., Spielman, M., Tiwari, S., Adams, S., Fenby, N.
and Scott, R. J. (2006). The AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 gene of
Arabidopsis links auxin signalling, cell division, and the size of seeds and
other organs. Development
133,251
-261.
Schwab, R., Palatnik, J. F., Riester, M., Schommer, C., Schmid, M. and Weigel, D. (2005). Specific effects of MicroRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev. Cell 8, 517-527.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sessions, A., Nemhauser, J. L., McColl, A., Roe, J. L., Feldmann, K. A. and Zambryski, P. C. (1997). ETTIN patterns the Arabidopsis floral meristem and reproductive organs. Development 124,4481 -4491.[Abstract]
Sessions, A., Weigel, D. and Yanofsky, M. F. (1999). The Arabidopsis thaliana MERISTEM LAYER 1 promoter specifies epidermal expression in meristems and young primordia. Plant J. 20,259 -263.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sieber, P., Gheyselinck, J., Gross-Hardt, R., Laux, T., Grossniklaus, U. and Schneitz, K. (2004). Pattern formation during early ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev. Biol. 273,321 -334.[CrossRef][Medline]
Skinner, D. J., Hill, T. A. and Gasser, C. S.
(2004). Regulation of ovule development. Plant
Cell 16,S32
-S45.
Smyth, D. R., Bowman, J. L. and Meyerowitz, E. M.
(1990). Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant
Cell 2,755
-767.
Stark, A., Brennecke, J., Bushati, N., Russell, R. B. and Cohen, S. M. (2005). Animal MicroRNAs confer robustness to gene expression and have a significant impact on 3'UTR evolution. Cell 123,1133 -1146.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sunkar, R., Girke, T., Jain, P. K. and Zhu, J. K.
(2005). Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from rice.
Plant Cell 17,1397
.
Tian, Q., Nagpal, P. and Reed, J. W. (2003). Regulation of Arabidopsis SHY2/IAA3 protein turnover. Plant J. 36,643 -651.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tiwari, S. B., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T.
(2003). The roles of auxin response factor domains in
auxin-responsive transcription. Plant Cell
15,533
-543.
Ulmasov, T., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1997). ARF1, a transcription factor that binds to auxin response
elements. Science 276,1865
-1868.
Valoczi, A., Varallyay, E., Kauppinen, S., Burgyan, J. and Havelda, Z. (2006). Spatio-temporal accumulation of microRNAs is highly coordinated in developing plant tissues. Plant J. 47,140 -151.[CrossRef][Medline]
Villanueva, J. M., Broadhvest, J., Hauser, B. A., Meister, R.
J., Schneitz, K. and Gasser, C. S. (1999). INNER NO OUTER
regulates abaxial-adaxial patterning in Arabidopsis ovules. Genes
Dev. 13,3160
-3169.
Wang, J. W., Wang, L. J., Mao, Y. B., Cai, W. J., Xue, H. W. and
Chen, X. Y. (2005). Control of root cap formation by
MicroRNA-targeted auxin response factors in Arabidopsis. Plant
Cell 17,2204
-2216.
Williams, L., Grigg, S. P., Xie, M., Christensen, S. and
Fletcher, J. C. (2005). Regulation of Arabidopsis shoot
apical meristem and lateral organ formation by microRNA miR166g and its
AtHD-ZIP target genes. Development
132,3657
-3668.
Xie, Z., Allen, E., Fahlgren, N., Calamar, A., Givan, S. A. and
Carrington, J. C. (2005). Expression of Arabidopsis MIRNA
genes. Plant Physiol.
138,2145
-2154.
Zuker, M. (2003). Mfold web server for nucleic
acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids
Res. 31,3406
-3415.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Cecchetti, M. M. Altamura, G. Falasca, P. Costantino, and M. Cardarelli Auxin Regulates Arabidopsis Anther Dehiscence, Pollen Maturation, and Filament Elongation PLANT CELL, July 1, 2008; 20(7): 1760 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-H. Liu, X. Tian, Y.-J. Li, C.-A. Wu, and C.-C. Zheng Microarray-based analysis of stress-regulated microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana RNA, May 1, 2008; 14(5): 836 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Gifford, A. Dean, R. A. Gutierrez, G. M. Coruzzi, and K. D. Birnbaum Cell-specific nitrogen responses mediate developmental plasticity PNAS, January 15, 2008; 105(2): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2006 J. Exp. Bot., April 20, 2007; (2007) erm028v2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||