spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 7


Fig. 7. Genetic interactions of ER-family genes with PFS2. (A-D) SEMs of mature Arabidopsis ovules. (A) pfs2-1 ovules have aberrant integument development. (B) er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+ ovules. (C,D) er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+ pfs2-1 mutant ovules have variability in integument development with reduced growth of the outer integument and some bifurcation of developing integuments. (E-G) DIC images of mature ovules. (E) pfs2-1 ovules have some partially developed embryo sacs. (F) er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+ has a penetrant phenotype of a small mass of cells in place of the embryo sac. (G) er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+ pfs2-1 mutant ovules display variability in embryo sac development similar to the pfs2-1 single mutant. Embryo sac nuclei are indicated by white arrowheads. (H-K) In situ hybridization in the pfs2-1 mutant using ERL1 (H,I) and ER (J,K) antisense probes. (L,M) In situ hybridization in wild type using a PFS2 antisense probe. (N,O) In situ hybridization in er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+ using a PFS2 antisense probe. (P,Q) Extended exposure of PFS2 antisense probe in wild type and er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+. Intense signal was observed in the inner integuments (arrowheads). No signal was detected with sense probes for ERL1, ER or PFS2. Scale bars: 20 µm. (R) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of PFS2 expression in stage 3-II ovules, given as fold-difference relative to wild type. *, Raw data collected as PFS2 transcript abundance relative to ACTIN 2 (wild type versus er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+. Experiment 1: 0.205±0.04 versus 0.351±0.02; Student's t-test P=0.03; 1.72 fold increase in er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+. Experiment 2: 0.141±0.003 versus 0.603±0.04; Student's t-test P=0.001; 4.2 fold increase in er-105 erl1-2 erl2-1/+).





Right arrow Return to article