|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 24 January 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.02779
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: W.Bickmore{at}hgu.mrc.ac.uk)
Accepted 7 December 2006
 |
SUMMARY |
|---|
 TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Key words: Chromatin condensation, Chromosome territory, Embryonic stem cells, Hox, Limb bud, Mouse
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
) and
chromosome territories (CTs) has been correlated with active transcription. In
the latter case, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detects a
relocalisation of some active genes to positions beyond the visible limits of
CTs (Volpi et al., 2000;
Williams et al., 2002;
Mahy et al., 2002). An
`opening', or decondensation, of higher-order chromatin structure is also
thought to be linked to gene activation
(Mohd-Sarip and Verrijzer,
2004). Indeed, it has been suggested that the `looping out' of
gene loci from CTs is a visual manifestation of a large-scale chromatin
decondensation (Volpi et al.,
2000; Gilbert et al.,
2004).
To understand how changes in complex chromatin structure relate to the
expression of genes, and to work towards an understanding of the mechanisms
that initiate and regulate them, requires an inducible system of co-regulated
gene expression. One system that affords this is Hox gene loci. Transgene
studies and genetically induced rearrangements of Hox loci have led to a
suggestion that there might be a progressive opening of chromatin structure
through Hox loci from 3' to 5' that controls sequential gene
activation colinear with the order of the genes on the chromosome
(van der Hoeven et al., 1996;
Kmita and Duboule, 2003).
Support for this model has come from our previous analysis of the murine
Hoxb locus both ex vivo, during the differentiation of embryonic stem
(ES) cells, and in vivo in cells of the primitive streak and adjacent mesoderm
during early embryogenesis and also along the rostrocaudal (head to tail) axis
of the embryo later in development. In both cases, there is visible chromatin
decondensation and a looping out of Hoxb genes from their CTs as the
expression of Hoxb is induced
(Chambeyron and Bickmore, 2004;
Chambeyron et al., 2005).
If these large-scale chromatin remodelling events are fundamental to the
regulation of Hox loci, and possibly also their colinear expression, then they
should be conserved between paralogous gene clusters. The four mammalian
autosomal Hox gene loci are the result of an ancestral duplication that
occurred at the origin of vertebrate evolution
(Ferrier and Minguillon, 2003).
Each cluster still exhibits temporal and spatial colinearity of gene
expression along the rostrocaudal axis of the trunk. However, Hoxd,
but not Hoxb, genes have been co-opted more recently in evolution
into the regulation of developing limbs and external genitalia and this
required the appearance of novel regulatory elements around Hoxd. An
enhancer controlling expression of Hoxd10-d13 and the adjacent
Lnp gene in digits and in the distalmost part of the limb buds has
been identified 
160 kb 5' of Hoxd
(Spitz et al., 2003;
Spitz et al., 2005).
Similarly, control regions 3' of Hoxd have been postulated to
control colinear Hoxd expression in the nascent limb bud
(Fig. 1)
(Zakany et al., 2004;
Deschamps and van Nes, 2005)
and gut (Spitz et al., 2005).
Limb malformations in humans with chromosomal rearrangements 5' and
3' of HOXD also suggest that regulatory elements in the
large-scale genomic context around the locus are important for correct gene
expression or for protection from position effects
(Spitz et al., 2002;
Dlugaszewska et al., 2006).
No such regulatory elements flanking Hoxb have been described. Therefore, it was unclear whether chromatin decondensation and looping out from the CT, similar to that at Hoxb, would occur at Hoxd, nor whether the nuclear reorganisation accompanying Hoxd expression would be the same along the rostrocaudal embryonic axis and in the limb bud.
Here, we have analysed the nuclear organisation of a 1 Mb region
around the Hoxd cluster in both differentiating ES cells and the
embryonic day (E) 9.5 embryo. As at Hoxb, we see chromatin
decondensation and a looping out of the Hoxd region from its CT,
suggesting that these are part of ancestral chromatin-based mechanisms for
regulating Hox loci. However, contrary to expectations, we have dissociated
these two facets of nuclear reorganisation from each other. During ES cell
differentiation we show that movement of the Hoxd region towards the
outside of the CT can occur before its apparent chromatin decondensation. In
the embryo, both looping out and decondensation occur in the tailbud region,
but in the limb bud there is decondensation of the Hoxd region in the
absence of discernable looping out. This may reflect different modes of
Hoxd regulation that occur in different developmental contexts.
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). They
were maintained undifferentiated by growth on 0.1% gelatin-coated dishes in
Glasgow's minimal Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum,
nonessential amino acids, 1 mmol/l sodium pyruvate, 0.3 mg/ml L-glutamine, 0.1
mmol/l 2-mercaptoethanol, 1000 U/ml human recombinant leukaemia inhibitory
factor (LIF) and 100 µg/ml hyg
(Chambeyron and Bickmore,
2004). Differentiation was induced by plating the cells at low
density without LIF or hyg for 1 day. Retinoic acid (RA)
5x10-6 M was then added. On day 3 the cells were replated in
RA-containing medium complemented with 2.5 µmol/l Ganciclovir. Samples for
RNA extraction and nuclei preparation were collected every 2 days of
differentiation. Similar results were obtained on samples from two independent
differentiation experiments. Data presented in this paper all come from the
same differentiation.
Mouse embryo sectioning and DNA FISH
Analysis of E9.5 embryos was as previously described
(Chambeyron et al., 2005).
Embryos from crosses between Dct-LacZ homozygous transgenic CD1XCD1
mice were collected at E9.5, fixed in 4% formaldehyde overnight at 4°C,
dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, cleared in xylene and embedded in
paraffin blocks. Adjacent serial sections were cut at 4 µm and used for DNA
FISH and Haematoxylin-Eosin staining. For FISH, sections laid on Superfrost
slides were heated to 60°C for 20 minutes and washed four times in xylene
for 10 minutes each before rehydration through an ethanol series. They were
then microwaved for 20 minutes in 0.1 mol/l citrate pH 6 buffer, washed in
water and rinsed once in 2x SSC before use. FISH was performed as
described below, except for the denaturation step, which was for 3 minutes at
75°C in 70% formamide/2x SSC pH 7.5 followed by 3 minutes in
ice-cold 70% ethanol.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using Tri-reagent (SIGMA) and assessed by
electrophoresis. Random-primed reverse transcriptions were performed at
42°C for 1 hour on 5 µg total RNA by using 1 Unit Superscript II
Reverse transcriptase (RT) (Invitrogen) and 4 µl random hexamers (50
mmol/l; Amersham Pharmacia) in a 50 µl reaction. A negative control
reaction, lacking enzyme, was performed in parallel for each RNA sample. One
microlitre of these reactions were amplified by PCR using 1 Unit Taq
polymerase (Amplitaq, Roche), 2 mmol/l magnesium chloride and 1 µmol/l
forward and reverse primers in a 20 µl reaction. All primer pairs used span
exons and therefore only detected the spliced transcripts. PCR conditions and
primer sequences are described in Table
1.
|
). FITC-labelled paint for MMU2 was purchased from CAMBIO. BAC
and fosmid clones covering the Hoxd region were chosen from ENSEMBL
v37, Feb 2006
(http://www.ensembl.org/Mus_musculus/index.html).
BAC clones were purchased from BACPAC resources center and fosmid clones were
kindly provided by the Sanger Institute (Cambridge, UK) (for coordinates and
names, see Table 2). DNA from
clones was prepared using standard alkaline lysis and labelled by
nick-translation with digoxigenin-11-dUTP or biotin-16-dUTP (Roche).
Approximately 200 ng FITC-paint, 100 ng biotin-labelled BAC or fosmid probe
and 100 ng digoxigenin BAC or fosmid probe were used per slide, together with
15 µg mouse Cot1 DNA (GIBCO BRL) and 5 µg salmon sperm DNA.
Digoxigenin-labelled probes were detected using Rhodamine anti-digoxigenin and
Texas Red anti-sheep IgG (Vector Laboratories); biotin-labelled probes were
detected using Cy5 streptavidin and biotinylated anti-avidin (Vector
Laboratories); and the FITC signal from the MMU2 chromosome paint was
amplified using F1 rabbit anti-FITC and F2 FITC anti-rabbit (CAMBIO).
Hybridisation, washes and detection were as described previously
(Chambeyron and Bickmore,
2004). Slides were counterstained with 0.5 µg/ml DAPI.
|
).
For 3D FISH, slides were examined using a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence
microscope with Plan-neofluar or Plan apochromat objectives, a 50 W Hg source
(Carl Zeiss, Welwyn Garden City, UK) and Chroma #83000 triple band pass filter
set (Chroma Technology Corp., Rockingham, VT) with the excitation filters
installed in a motorised filter wheel (Ludl Electronic Products, Hawthorne,
NY). A piezoelectrically driven objective mount (PIFOCi model P-721, Physik
Instrumente GmbH & Co., Karlsruhe) and a Princeton Instruments Micromax
CCD camera with Kodak 1400e sensor (Universal Imaging, Maldon, UK), were used
to control movement in the z dimension and collect image stacks with
a 0.2 µm step. Hardware control, image capture and analysis were performed
using in-house scripts written for IPLab Spectrum (Scanalytics Corp., Fairfax,
VA). Images were deconvolved using a calculated PSF with the constrained
iterative volume algorithm of Microtome (Scanalytics Corp., Fairfax, VA).
Three-dimensional distance measurements were as described previously
(Chambeyron et al., 2005). A
minimum of 50 nuclei was analysed for each tissue.
|
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). In
the E9.5 embryo, differential looping out of Hoxb from its CT occurs
along the rostrocaudal axis of the neural tube. Hoxb1, at the
3' end of Hoxb, is extensively looped outside its CT in nuclei
of rhombomere 4 (r4), where it is strongly expressed, but not more caudally in
r5 or more posterior parts of the spinal cord, where it is not expressed. The
tailbud is the most caudal part of the spinal cord, resulting from the
regression of the primitive streak earlier in development. Both 3' and
5' Hoxb genes are widely expressed in the tailbud and,
concomitantly, both 3' and 5' ends of the Hoxb locus
locate just outside the CT in this embryonic region
(Chambeyron et al., 2005).
Hoxd genes are also widely expressed in the tailbud region
(Tarchini and Duboule, 2006;
Zakany et al., 2001).
Therefore, we used 3D DNA FISH on E9.5 mouse embryo sections to determine
whether the Hoxd region is looped out from its CT in the tailbud.
Rhombomeres 1, 2 and 4, where Hoxd genes are not expressed
(McKay et al., 1994;
Zakany et al., 2001;
Zhang et al., 1994), were used
as control tissues. Nuclear distances between the probe signals and the edge
of mouse chromosome 2 (MMU2) CT, where Hoxd is located, were
determined using a previously described script
(Mahy et al., 2002;
Chambeyron and Bickmore, 2004;
Chambeyron et al., 2005). In
this analysis a probe signal is considered to be outside the CT when its
distance to the CT edge is negative. Distances >0 correspond to probe
signals inside the CT.
|
). However,
signals from a BAC located more 5' ('5'flank' RP23-288B11 in
Fig. 1) remained inside the CT
in both control and tailbud (P=0.66)
(Fig. 2A). Even in the
nonexpressing control tissues, Hoxd was located significantly
(P<0.001) closer to the CT edge than the two more 5'
regions, suggesting that the CT may be organised such that Hoxd is
poised before its activation (Fig.
2B).
Throughout the emerging limb bud of the E9.5 embryo, 3' Hoxd
genes, up to and including Hoxd9, are also expressed
(Tarchini and Duboule, 2006;
Tarchini et al., 2006).
However, we found no significant looping out of the region from the CT in the
forelimb bud, compared with control tissues (P>0.09 for all three
BACs) (Fig. 2A-C). Therefore
activation of Hoxd in limb bud occurs in the absence of a
relocalisation of the locus outside the CT, whereas in the tailbud
Hoxd expression occurs in the context of a looping out of a large
region from the CT. There appears to be a boundary to the extent of this
looping out located between the BACs Lnp and 5' flank.
Decondensation of the Hoxd locus occurs in both the tailbud and limb bud
At Hoxb, movement away from the CT was also accompanied by a
visible increase in the nuclear distance between the 3' and the 5'
ends of the cluster, which is thought to represent a decondensation, or
unfolding, of higher-order chromatin structure
(Chambeyron and Bickmore, 2004;
Sachs et al., 1995;
Yokota et al., 1995). To
establish whether this also occurs along the Hoxd region, we measured
the interphase distances (d) between the 3D DNA FISH signals for the Hoxd, and
Lnp BACs in nuclei from E9.5 embryos. There was significant
(P<10-3) movement to larger d values in both the
tailbud and limb bud compared with the Hoxd nonexpressing control
tissues. Interphase decondensation was also detected between the 5'
flank and Lnp BACs (P=0.01 and <10-3 in tailbud and
limb bud, respectively) (Fig.
2D,E).
Another manifestation of chromatin decondensation lies in the shape of the BAC hybridisation signals. Whereas the signals detected with the 5' flank BAC were well-defined pinpoints, the Lnp and Hoxd BACs often gave stretched-out tracks of signals. This was especially prominent for the Hoxd probe in the limb bud (Fig. 2F,G).
Therefore, long-range decondensation of the entire region extending from Lnp to the Hoxd cluster correlated with Hoxd expression in E9.5 embryos. In the tailbud, 20% of Hoxd loci appeared decondensed, which is similar to the percentage of loci localised outside the MMU2 CT. However, there was also decondensation of Hoxd in the limb bud, where there was no relocalisation of this region with respect to the CT. This suggests that `looping out' and decondensation are not just different manifestations of the same event of nuclear reorganisation.
|
|
|
). To determine whether similar activation occurs at
Hoxd we used RT-PCR to analyse the expression of Hoxd genes
(Fig. 3) in undifferentiated
OS25 ES cells, and during 18 days after the withdrawal of LIF and the addition
of RA. As for Hoxb, there was no detectable expression of
Hoxd genes in undifferentiated cells. The extinction of Oct4
expression upon differentiation was accompanied by the rapid induction (by day
2) of Hoxd1 expression, but not of the more 5' genes
Hoxd3 through to Hoxd12
(Fig. 3). Expression of
Hoxd3 and Hoxd4 were detected by day 6, Hoxd8 by
day 8, Hoxd9 and Hoxd10 by day 10 and Hoxd12
expression was not detected until day 18. Hoxd1 expression declined
at later stages of differentiation, but not as rapidly as seen for
Hoxb1 (Chambeyron and Bickmore,
2004).
Hoxd is flanked by structurally and functionally unrelated genes.
Expression of Mtx2, located 3' of Hoxd1
(Fig. 1), is induced by day 2
(Fig. 3), suggesting that this
gene might also be subject to temporal colinearity. However, at the 5'
end of Hoxd, the early detection of Hoxd13 expression (by
day 2) suggests a break in the temporal colinearity at this end of the cluster
in this system. A large conserved noncoding region 5' of Hoxd
(Fig. 1B), termed a global
control region (GCR), contains digit enhancers that act on Hoxd13,
Lnp and Evx2 (Tarchini and
Duboule, 2006). Neural enhancers in the GCR also act on
Evx2 and Lnp (Spitz et
al., 2003). As Evx2 is also activated early in the
timecourse of differentiation, this suggests that the GCR may have some
activity in ES cells. Lnp expression in ES cells is constitutive
(Fig. 3)
(Spitz et al., 2003). This
analysis shows that the colinear activation of the Hoxd cluster is
mostly recapitulated upon RA-induced ES cell differentiation.
Nuclear reorganisation of Hoxd is induced upon ES cell differentiation
We used 2D interphase FISH to determine whether the events of nuclear
reorganisation at Hoxd, seen in the embryo, also occur in
differentiating ES cells. As in control embryonic tissues, hybridisation
signals from the Hoxd and Lnp BAC probes were almost all located inside the CT
in undifferentiated cells (Fig.
4A,B), even though Lnp was expressed in them
(Fig. 3). These regions
relocalise outside the MMU2 CT upon differentiation (P<0.005), but
whereas the highest proportion (32%) of Hoxd alleles located >0.3 µm
outside the CT occurred by day 4 of differentiation, the maximum frequency of
extra-territory Lnp alleles was not seen until day 8
(Fig. 4A). The nuclear
behaviour of the region 3' of Hoxd and Mtx2, detected
by the RP23-7D13 (3' flank) BAC clone
(Fig. 1), was similar to that
of Lnp, with a maximal frequency of looping out from the CT at day 8 of
differentiation. After 14 days, signals from all three probes were relocated
back inside the CT (Fig. 4A,B).
As in the embryo, there was no movement detected with the 5' flank BAC
at any time point during differentiation
(Fig. 4B). Therefore, there is
a remarkably similar domain of chromatin around Hoxd that is located
outside its CT in the tailbud of the embryo, and that is induced to
transiently loop out from the CT during ES cell differentiation.
There is also a significant (P<10-3) increase in the interphase distances separating the Hoxd cluster (RP23-15M17) from Lnp (RP24-267L11), and Lnp from the 5' flank (RP23-288B11) during differentiation (Fig. 4C). At day 14, and concomitant with the relocalisation of the region back inside the CT, there is recondensation of the whole region (Fig. 4D). As in the embryo, extended tracks of hybridisation signals were often detected in differentiating ES cells with the Hoxd and the Lnp BAC probes (data not shown).
The relative kinetics of the intra-CT movements detected with probes across
the Hoxd region (Fig.
4A) suggests that these events initiate within the Hoxd
cluster itself, rather than in flanking regions. As the temporal activation of
Hox genes begins at the 3' ends of the clusters, we analysed
nuclear behaviour within the Hoxd locus itself using three fosmid
clones (121N10, 860J8 and 469P2; Fig.
1 and Table 2). In
undifferentiated ES cells, almost all (>88%) 3' Hoxd signals
(121N10 probe) were within the CT (Fig.
5A,B). By day 4 of differentiation, there was a significant
(P=0.01) shift of signals away from the CT, such that 25% of them
were then located outside. This is the same time point at which `looping out'
of Hoxb1 signals is seen from its CT
(Chambeyron and Bickmore,
2004). By day 14, 3' Hoxd signals were back within
the CT, similar to the situation before differentiation (P=0.95)
(Fig. 5A,B). Similar results
were obtained with 860J8, encompassing the central Hoxd genes (data
not shown). At the 5' end of Hoxd (469P2), there was also
movement towards and outside the CT edge, but this did not reach maximal
significance (P=0.004) until day 8
(Fig. 5B). This suggests that
nuclear reorganisation initiates at the 3' end of Hoxd and this
is also supported by a comparison of the mean probe positions during the
timecourse of differentiation (Fig.
5C).
Chromatin decondensation also occurs within Hoxd. The midpoints of the 3' (121N10) and 5' (469P2) Hoxd probes were 90 kb apart and their hybridisation signals were barely separable in undifferentiated cells (Fig. 5A). At days 4-8 of differentiation, there was a significant (P<10-3) increase in the interphase separation between them (Fig. 5D). There was some recondensation by day 14, but their separation was still greater than that before differentiation (P=0.006), suggesting that the structure of the Hoxd cluster remains in an altered state. To confirm that decondensation over such short genomic distances was not an artefact of the 2D DNA FISH, we confirmed that there was also a significant increase in the interphase separations between 121N10 and 860J8 fosmids during differentiation, using 3D FISH (Fig. 5E). A similar relative degree of decondensation was detected by 2D and 3D FISH, even though the former exaggerated the absolute interphase distances (Fig. 5F).
Looping out and chromatin decondensation can be distinct modes of nuclear reorganisation at Hoxd
Superficially, the similar kinetics of looping out and chromatin
decondensation of the Hoxd region during ES cell differentiation are
consistent with the suggestion that looping out from CTs is a visual
manifestation of chromatin decondensation that has been propagated over a long
range (Volpi et al., 2000;
Gilbert et al., 2004). However,
our observation in the embryo proper, of extensive decondensation in the
absence of looping out, led us to question this. To determine whether
interphase decondensation and looping out are indeed synonymous events, we
used four-colour DNA FISH to simultaneously measure the nuclear positions of
different parts of Hoxd both relative to each other and relative to
the CT during ES cell differentiation. When we looked between the 5'
flanking region, which remained fixed inside the CT, and either the Lnp or
Hoxd regions, which moved away to locations outside the CT during
differentiation, the increase in inter-probe distances was indeed correlated
with looping of Hoxd outside the MMU2 CT (R2=0.44 at day
4) (Fig. 6A-C).
However, a very different pattern emerged when we examined probes within the region that loops out of the CT (from Lnp to the 3' flank, including Hoxd itself). Movement of Lnp and the 3' flank occurred together: it was rare to find one probe outside a CT while the other remained inside (Fig. 6D,E). However, this movement preceded interphase separation, as both probes found outside the CT at day 4 were still spatially close together (<0.5 µm) (Fig. 6F). At day 8, when there was both looping out and apparent decondensation, there was no correlation between the two events (in linear regression analysis R2<0.001) (Fig. 6E). Lnp and 3' flank signals located far outside the bounds of the visible CT could appear to still be quite closely juxtaposed, and widely separated signals could be seen within the CT (Fig. 6D). The same lack of correlation between movement and interphase separation was also observed between Lnp and the Hoxd cluster itself, and even between the 3' and 5' ends of Hoxd (data not shown).
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
), or during embryonic development
(Chambeyron et al., 2005). Here
we show that similar events of nuclear reorganisation also occur at
Hoxd in the tailbud region of the E9.5 embryo
(Fig. 2) and during ES cell
differentiation (Fig. 4).
Nuclear reorganisation of Hox loci therefore reflects a basic mechanism
underlying the specific activation of these gene clusters in differentiation,
and in development along the rostrocaudal embryonic axis. Thus it seems likely
that this mechanism predates the duplication and divergence of vertebrate Hox
clusters more than 500 million years ago
(Pollard and Holland, 2000;
Ferrier and Minguillon,
2003).
Nuclear reorganisation initiates within Hoxd, but then spreads out to encompass unrelated genes
Although activation of Hoxd is accompanied by its nuclear
reorganisation, a simple escape from the CT cannot be sufficient to explain
the temporal activation of gene expression during ES cell differentiation.
Whereas the kinetics of Hoxd1 activation is contemporaneous with its
movement away from the CT by day 4, expression of Hoxd3 (on the same
fosmid clone as Hoxd1) is not detected by RT-PCR until day 6
(Fig. 2). Conversely, maximal
relocalisation of the 5' Hoxd fosmid is seen by day 8 of
differentiation, but Hoxd12 expression is not detected by RT-PCR
until day 18, at which time the Hoxd region has been retracted back
into the CT. This suggests that movement away from the CT is not sufficient to
activate the expression of all Hoxd genes and that additional
chromatin modifications must occur to allow for gene expression per se. Also,
it seems unlikely that it is necessary for 5' Hox genes
(Hoxd12) to be outside the CT when they are expressed, although we
cannot exclude the possibility that Hoxd12 expression is originating
from that small proportion (10%) of alleles that remain outside the CT at the
end of differentiation (Fig.
5B). Combined RNA and DNA FISH might resolve this, but we have
been unable to detect Hox expression by RNA FISH. This may be due to the fact
both that Hox genes have only one small intron, and that microarray analysis
shows that levels of Hoxd gene expression are not very high (data not
shown).
Looping out of chromatin away from the CT, initiated within Hoxd,
then spreads out in both directions to encompass unrelated flanking genes
(Figs 2,
4). The activation of
Mtx2 expression early in differentiation 3' of Hoxd
(Fig. 3) might be a response to
the spread of nuclear reorganisation. Similarly, the timecourse of
Evx2 expression immediately 5' of Hoxd appears to
parallel the spread of chromatin looping and decondensation
(Fig. 4). Interestingly the
proximity of Evx genes to another Hox locus (Hoxa) suggests that
Evx2 was part of an ancestral Hox cluster
(Pollard and Holland, 2000;
Ferrier and Minguillon, 2003),
so it may have evolved to respond to global chromosomal cues regulating Hox
regulation. However, beyond Evx2, Lnp is a recent evolutionary
recruit to this Hox locus. Its expression does not respond to Hoxd
nuclear reorganisation during ES cell differentiation
(Fig. 3), or in the tailbud of
the E9.5 embryo (Spitz et al.,
2003), even though it is relocalised towards the outside of the CT
in these situations (Figs 2,
4).
Pathways leading to looping out and chromatin unfolding
Our previous analyses showing both interphase probe separation and looping
out at Hoxb, in ES cell differentiation
(Chambeyron and Bickmore,
2004), and in the embryo
(Chambeyron et al., 2005),
appeared to be consistent with the idea that looping out from CTs and
chromatin decondensation are two sides of the same coin
(Volpi et al., 2000;
Gilbert et al., 2004). However,
our analysis here of Hoxd has thrown up discordances between
interlocus interphase distances and movement of the loci to the outside of
CTs. In two different Hoxd-expressing regions of the E9.5 embryo, one
- the tailbud - shows both looping out and decondensation at Hoxd,
whereas the other - the limb bud at E9.5 - shows extensive chromatin
decondensation but no evidence of any looping out of Hoxd
(Fig. 2). We therefore assayed
simultaneously, at each allele during ES cell differentiation, the
localisation with respect to the CT, and the interphase probe separation.
Whereas the movement of the Hoxd region to sites outside the CT
correlates with its interphase separation from a 5' probe (288B11) that
remains inside the CT, a more complex situation was seen within the
Hoxd region itself - from Lnp to the 3' flank
(Fig. 6). The first (day 4)
nuclear events seen within this region are movement to the outside of the CT,
without chromatin decondensation as assayed by interphase separation. When a
movement to larger inter-probe distances is seen at day 8, this occurs
regardless of position relative to the CT. One possibility is that long-range
unfolding of chromatin structure allows the locus a greater degree of mobility
so that it can move dynamically in and out of the CT. Thus, although both
events are triggered upon ES differentiation, looping out does not depend on a
prior decondensation of the region, and chromatin decondensation may not lead
directly to a looping out from the CT.
Most published in situ hybridisations on embryos at around E9.5 suggest
that levels of Hoxd expression in the tailbud and limb bud are
similar (e.g. Tarchini and Duboule,
2006), but there is evidence for stronger expression of
Hoxd4 in the tailbud compared with the limb bud
(Akasaka et al., 2001)
(http://genex.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/das/jsp/submission.jsp?id=EMAGE:48).
Therefore at this stage, we cannot exclude that the differential nuclear
organisation of Hoxd in tailbud and limb bud is due to different
levels of Hoxd transcription. Also, different regulatory pathways
might be responsible for Hoxd activation along the rostrocaudal and
the secondary axis of the embryo. The temporal activation of
Hoxd1-d9 in the early limb bud is thought to be under the
control of an early limb bud activating element (ELCR) located 3' of the
cluster (Tarchini and Duboule,
2006), but its role in the regulation of Hoxd along the
rostrocaudal axis has not been fully explored. Understanding how different
modes of regulation feed in to altered chromatin structures at Hox loci will
be key to further elucidating how the expression of these developmental
players is regulated so exquisitely in time and space.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Akasaka, T., van Lohuizen, M., van der Lugt, N., Mizutani-Koseki, Y., Kanno, M., Taniguchi, M., Vidal, M., Alkema, M., Berns, A. and Koseki, H. (2001). Mice doubly deficient for the Polycomb Group genes Mel18 and Bmi1 reveal synergy and requirement for maintenance but not initiation of Hox gene expression. Development 128,1587 -1597.[Abstract]
Billon, N., Jolicoeur, C., Ying, Q. L., Smith, A. and Raff,
M. (2002). Normal timing of oligodendrocyte development from
genetically engineered, lineageselectable mouse ES cells. J. Cell
Sci. 115,3657
-3665.
Chambeyron, S. and Bickmore, W. A. (2004).
Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon
induction of transcription. Genes Dev.
18,1119
-1130.
Chambeyron, S., Da Silva, N. R., Lawson, K. A. and Bickmore, W.
A. (2005). Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during
mouse embryonic development. Development
132,2215
-2223.
Deschamps, J. and van Nes, J. (2005).
Developmental regulation of the Hox genes during axial morphogenesis in the
mouse. Development 132,2931
-2942.
Dlugaszewska, B., Silahtaroglu, A., Menzel, C., Kubart, S.,
Cohen, M., Mundlos, S., Tumer, Z., Kjaer, K., Friedrich, U., Ropers, H. H. et
al. (2006). Breakpoints around the HOXD cluster result in
various limb malformations. J. Med. Genet.
43,111
-118.
Ferrier, D. E. and Minguillon, C. (2003). Evolution of the Hox/ParaHox gene clusters. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47,605 -611.[Medline]
Gilbert, N., Boyle, S., Fiegler, H., Woodfine, K., Carter, N. P. and Bickmore, W. A. (2004). Chromatin architecture of the human genome: gene-rich domains are enriched in open chromatin fibres. Cell 118,555 -566.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kmita, M. and Duboule, D. (2003). Organizing
axes in time and space; 25 years of colinear tinkering.
Science 301,331
-333.
Mahy, N. L., Perry, P. E. and Bickmore, W. A.
(2002). Gene density and transcription influence the localization
of chromatin outside of chromosome territories detectable by FISH.
J. Cell Biol. 159,753
-763.
McKay, I. J., Muchamore, I., Krumlauf, R., Maden, M., Lumsden, A. and Lewis, J. (1994). The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres. Development 120,2199 -2211.[Abstract]
Mohd-Sarip, A. and Verrijzer, C. P. (2004).
Molecular biology. A higher order of silence. Science
306,1484
-1485.
Osborne, C. S., Chakalova, L., Brown, K. E., Carter, D., Horton, A., Debrand, E., Goyenechea, B., Mitchell, J. A., Lopes, S., Reik, W. et al. (2004). Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat. Genet. 36,1065 -1071.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pollard, S. L. and Holland, P. W. (2000). Evidence for 14 homeobox gene clusters in human genome ancestry. Curr. Biol. 10,1059 -1062.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sachs, R. K., van den Engh, G., Trask, B., Yokota, H. and
Hearst, J. E. (1995). A random-walk/giant-loop model for
interphase chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92,2710
-2714.
Spitz, F., Montavon, T., Monso-Hinard, C., Morris, M., Ventruto, M. L., Antonarakis, S., Ventruto, V. and Duboule, D. (2002). A t(2;8) balanced translocation with breakpoints near the human HOXD complex causes mesomelic dysplasia and vertebral defects. Genomics 79,493 -498.[CrossRef][Medline]
Spitz, F., Gonzalez, F. and Duboule, D. (2003). A global control region defines a chromosomal regulatory landscape containing the HoxD cluster. Cell 113,405 -417.[CrossRef][Medline]
Spitz, F., Herkenne, C., Morris, M. A. and Duboule, D. (2005). Inversioninduced disruption of the Hoxd cluster leads to the partition of regulatory landscapes. Nat. Genet. 37,889 -893.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tarchini, B. and Duboule, D. (2006). Control of Hoxd genes' collinearity during early limb development. Dev. Cell 10,93 -103.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tarchini, B., Duboule, D. and Kmita, M. (2006). Regulatory constraints in the evolution of the tetrapod limb anterior-posterior polarity. Nature 443,985 -988.[CrossRef][Medline]
van der Hoeven, F., Zakany, J. and Duboule, D. (1996). Gene transpositions in the HoxD complex reveal a hierarchy of regulatory controls. Cell 85,1025 -1035.[CrossRef][Medline]
Volpi, E. V., Chevret, E., Jones, T., Vatcheva, R., Williamson, J., Beck, S., Campbell, R. D., Goldsworthy, M., Powis, S. H., Ragoussis, J. et al. (2000). Large-scale chromatin organization of the major histocompatibility complex and other regions of human chromosome 6 and its response to interferon in interphase nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 113,1565 -1576.[Abstract]
Williams, R. R., Broad, S., Sheer, D. and Ragoussis, J. (2002). Subchromosomal positioning of the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) in keratinocyte and lymphoblast interphase nuclei. Exp. Cell Res. 272,163 -175.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yokota, H., van den Engh, G., Hearst, J. E., Sachs, R. K. and
Trask, B. J. (1995). Evidence for the organization of
chromatin in megabase pair-sized loops arranged along a random walk path in
the human G0/G1 interphase nucleus. J. Cell Biol.
130,1239
-1249.
Zakany, J., Kmita, M., Alarcon, P., de la Pompa, J. L. and Duboule, D. (2001). Localized and transient transcription of Hox genes suggests a link between patterning and the segmentation clock. Cell 106,207 -217.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zakany, J., Kmita, M. and Duboule, D. (2004). A
dual role for Hox genes in limb anterior-posterior asymmetry.
Science 304,1669
-1672.
Zhang, M., Kim, H. J., Marshall, H., Gendron-Maguire, M., Lucas,
D. A., Baron, A., Gudas, L. J., Gridley, T., Krumlauf, R. and Grippo, J.
F. (1994). Ectopic Hoxa-1 induces rhombomere transformation
in mouse hindbrain. Development
120,2431
-2442.
Related articles in Development:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
